Re: Various kbuild problems in 2.5.22

[Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>]

Użytkownik Kai Germaschewski napisał:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> 
> 
>>	No, "make -k" still will not build bzImage if a module
>>fails to compile.
>>
>>	Also, I do not understand why this is "intentional."  Normally,
>>if one does a "make" of a file in a source tree, build problems with
>>unneeded files do not effect it.
> 
> 
> Yes, but they are not unneeded files, otherwise we wouldn't even try to 
> build them. The point is, the semantics of bzImage changed: It now means 
> "build bzImage and modules". That's the common case. If you really only 

It is very inconenient if you are working only on some things
which don't affect any thing you are compiling as a module
during the edit/compile cycle or if you don't care to update
some modules you have just in case configured during developement.

How does one build the sole non modularized part of the kernel
nowadays? (Note: it is inconvenient now, but I'm not insisting.)

> want bzImage and no modules, you have to tell make by using
> "make KBUILD_MODULES= bzImage" (I could allow for phrasing the latter as
> "make bzImage nomodules", but that's only cosmetical)