Re: [patch] scheduler bits from 2.5.23-dj1

William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-20T17:53:04Z

On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 07:31:18PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> looks good to me - what do you think about my other pidhash suggestion:

>> And i'm not quite sure whether it's needed to expose the pidhash to the
>> rest of the kernel - it would be much simpler to have it in
>> kernel/fork.c locally, and find_task_by_pid() would be a function
>> instead of an inline. (it has a ~49 bytes footprint on x86, it's rather
>> heavy i think.)

It's an excellent idea, I think I only forgot that was in the queue of
things to write. I'll follow up with that as well.

Thanks,
Bill