From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: "Gross, Mark" <mark.gross@intel.com>
Cc: "'Russell Leighton'" <russ@elegant-software.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
mgross@unix-os.sc.intel.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, "Griffiths,
Richard A" <richard.a.griffiths@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles gets large
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:10:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D11FE5F.8000207@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 59885C5E3098D511AD690002A5072D3C057B499E@orsmsx111.jf.intel.com
Gross, Mark wrote:
> We will get around to reformatting our spindles to some other FS after
> we get as much data and analysis out of our current configuration as we
> can get.
>
> We'll report out our findings on the lock contention, and throughput
> data for some other FS then. I'd like recommendations on what file
> systems to try, besides ext2.
Do you really need a journaling FS? If not, I think ext2 is a sure
bet to be the fastest. If you do need journaling, try reiserfs and jfs.
BTW, what kind of workload are you running under?
--
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com
next parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-20 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <59885C5E3098D511AD690002A5072D3C057B499E@orsmsx111.jf.intel.com>
2002-06-20 16:10 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2002-06-20 20:47 ` [Lse-tech] Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles gets large John Hawkes
2002-06-23 4:33 Andreas Dilger
2002-06-23 6:00 ` Christopher E. Brown
2002-06-23 6:35 ` [Lse-tech] " William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-23 7:29 ` Dave Hansen
2002-06-23 7:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-23 7:45 ` Dave Hansen
2002-06-23 7:55 ` Christopher E. Brown
2002-06-23 8:11 ` David Lang
2002-06-23 8:31 ` Dave Hansen
2002-06-23 16:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-06-23 17:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-21 22:03 Duc Vianney
2002-06-21 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2002-06-22 0:19 ` kwijibo
2002-06-22 8:10 ` kwijibo
2002-06-20 16:24 [Lse-tech] Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of s pindles " Gross, Mark
2002-06-20 21:11 ` [Lse-tech] Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles " Andrew Morton
2002-06-19 21:29 mgross
2002-06-20 0:54 ` Andrew Morton
2002-06-20 4:09 ` [Lse-tech] " Dave Hansen
2002-06-20 6:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-06-20 6:53 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D11FE5F.8000207@us.ibm.com \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
--cc=mgross@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--cc=richard.a.griffiths@intel.com \
--cc=russ@elegant-software.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox