Re: [PATCH 2.5.22] simple ide-tape.c and ide-floppy.c cleanup

[Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>]

Użytkownik Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz napisał:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> 
> 
>>Użytkownik Jens Axboe napisał:
>>
>>>On Thu, Jun 20 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>U?ytkownik Jens Axboe napisa?:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, Jun 19 2002, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Looks pretty good in general, just one minor detail:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>+
>>>>>>+/*
>>>>>>+ *	ATAPI packet commands.
>>>>>>+ */
>>>>>>+#define ATAPI_FORMAT_UNIT_CMD		0x04
>>>>>>+#define ATAPI_INQUIRY_CMD		0x12
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>[snip]
>>>>>
>>>>>We already have the "full" list in cdrom.h (GPCMD_*), so lets just use
>>>>>that. After all, ATAPI_MODE_SELECT10_CMD _is_ the same as the SCSI
>>>>>variant (and I think the _CMD post fixing is silly, anyone familiar with
>>>>>this is going to know what ATAPI_WRITE10 means just fine)
>>>>>
>>>>>Same for request_sense, that is already generalized in cdrom.h as well.
>>>>
>>>>I wonder what FreeBSD is using here? I see no need for invention at
>>>>this place.
>>>
>>>
>>>The invention would be adding the ATAPI_* commands, Linux has used the
>>>GPCMD_ convention for quite some time now.
>>
>>Agreed. The ATAPI prefix would be confusing, since those are in reality SCSI
>>commands anyway...
> 
> 
> I think we should use scsi.h and get rid of GPCMD_* convention also.
> Jens, do you want "corrected" patch?

Yes that would be best / modulo possible name space clashes.
The names in scsi/scsi.h look too generic sometimes. Like:

#define TYPE_DISK           0x00
#define TYPE_TAPE           0x01
#define TYPE_PRINTER        0x02
#define TYPE_PROCESSOR      0x03    /* HP scanners use this */
#define TYPE_WORM           0x04    /* Treated as ROM by our system */
#define TYPE_ROM            0x05

or

/*
  *  Status codes
  */

#define GOOD                 0x00
#define BUSY                 0x04