From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Cort Dougan <cort@fsmlabs.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:40:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D123DB9.8090909@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020620103003.C6243@host110.fsmlabs.com
Użytkownik Cort Dougan napisał:
> "Beating the SMP horse to death" does make sense for 2 processor SMP
> machines. When 64 processor machines become commodity (Linux is a
> commodity hardware OS) something will have to be done. When research
64 processor machines will *never* become a commodity becouse:
1. It's not like paralell machines are something entierly new. They are
around for an awfoul long time on this planet. (nearly longer then myself)
2. See 1. even dual CPU machines are a rarity even *now*.
3. Nobody needs them for the usual tasks they are a *waste*
of resources and economics still applies.
4. SMP doesn't scale behind 4. Point. (64 hardly makes sense...)
5. It will never become a commodity to run highly transactional
workloads where integrated bunches of 4 make sense. Neiter will
it be common to solve partial differential equations for aeroplane
dynamics or to calculate the behaviour of an hydrogen bomb.
6. Even in the aerodynamics department an only 14 CPU machine was
very very fast. (NEC SX-3R)
7. Hyper threaded cores make hardly sense behind 2.
8. Amdahls law is math and not a decret from the Central Komitee of
the Kommunist Party or George Bush. You can not overrule it.
One exception could be dedicated rendering CPUs - which is the
direction where graphics cards are apparently heading - but they
will hardly ever need a general purpose operating system. But even then -
I'm still in the bunch of people who are not interrested
in any OpenGL or Direct whatever... The worsest graphics cards
those days drive my display screens at the resolutions I wish them too
just fine.
PS. I'm sick of seeing bunches of PC's which are accidentally in
the same room nowadays in the list of the 500 fastest computers
on the world. It makes this list useless...
If one want's to have a grasp on how the next generation of
really fast computers will look alike. Well: they will be based
on Johnson-junctions. TRW will build them (same company
as Voyager sonde). Look there they don't plan for thousands of CPUs
they plan for few CPUs in liquid helium:
http://www.trw.com/extlink/1,,,00.html?ExternalTRW=/images/imaps_2000_paper.pdf&DIR=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-20 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-18 17:18 latest linus-2.5 BK broken James Simmons
2002-06-18 17:46 ` Robert Love
2002-06-18 18:51 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 18:43 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-18 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 18:59 ` Robert Love
2002-06-18 20:05 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 20:31 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 21:12 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-18 21:08 ` Cort Dougan
2002-06-18 21:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-19 12:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-19 17:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 3:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-20 5:24 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-20 7:26 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-06-20 14:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-20 15:41 ` McVoy's Clusters (was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken) Sandy Harris
2002-06-20 17:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-20 20:42 ` Timothy D. Witham
2002-06-21 5:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-22 14:14 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-06-20 16:30 ` latest linus-2.5 BK broken Cort Dougan
2002-06-20 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-21 6:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-21 17:50 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-21 17:55 ` Robert Love
2002-06-21 18:09 ` Linux, the microkernel (was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken) Jeff Garzik
2002-06-21 18:46 ` Cort Dougan
2002-06-21 20:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-22 1:07 ` Horst von Brand
2002-06-22 1:23 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-22 12:41 ` Roman Zippel
2002-06-23 15:15 ` Sandy Harris
2002-06-23 17:29 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-06-24 6:27 ` Craig I. Hagan
2002-06-24 13:06 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-06-24 10:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-21 19:34 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-22 15:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-22 12:24 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-22 19:00 ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2002-06-22 21:09 ` jdow
2002-06-23 17:56 ` John Alvord
2002-06-23 20:48 ` jdow
2002-06-23 21:40 ` [OT] " Xavier Bestel
2002-06-22 18:25 ` latest linus-2.5 BK broken Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-22 19:26 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-22 22:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-22 23:10 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-23 6:34 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-23 22:56 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-06-20 17:16 ` RW Hawkins
2002-06-20 17:23 ` Cort Dougan
2002-06-20 20:40 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-06-20 20:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 21:27 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 21:59 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-20 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-20 22:41 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-21 0:09 ` Allen Campbell
2002-06-21 7:43 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-21 21:02 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-22 3:57 ` (RFC)i386 arch autodetect( was Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken ) Matthew D. Pitts
2002-06-22 4:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-21 16:01 ` Re: latest linus-2.5 BK broken Sandy Harris
2002-06-21 20:38 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-20 21:13 ` Timothy D. Witham
2002-06-21 19:53 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-21 5:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-19 10:21 ` Padraig Brady
2002-06-18 21:45 ` Bill Huey
2002-06-18 20:55 ` Robert Love
2002-06-19 13:31 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 19:29 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-18 19:19 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-18 19:49 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-18 19:27 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-18 20:13 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-18 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-18 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-18 23:38 Michael Hohnbaum
2002-06-18 23:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-19 0:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-06-19 1:00 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-06-19 23:48 ` Michael Hohnbaum
[not found] <E17KSLb-0007Dj-00@wagner.rustcorp.com.au>
2002-06-19 0:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-19 15:23 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-19 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-19 20:57 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-20 23:48 Miles Lane
2002-06-21 7:31 Martin Knoblauch
2002-06-21 12:59 Jesse Pollard
2002-06-24 21:28 Paul McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D123DB9.8090909@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=cort@fsmlabs.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox