public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* enums
@ 2002-06-27 12:56 Manik Raina
  2002-06-27 13:03 ` enums Manik Raina
  2002-06-28  4:31 ` enums Manik Raina
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manik Raina @ 2002-06-27 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 166 bytes --]

is there a particular reason we dislike constructs as attached in the
diffs below ?
with enums, we dont have to increment MAX_NR_ZONES everytime a new one
is added .

[-- Attachment #2: a --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 711 bytes --]

diff -u -r -U 6 cmp/include/linux/mmzone.h linux-2.5.24/include/linux/mmzone.h
--- cmp/include/linux/mmzone.h	Fri Jun 21 04:23:42 2002
+++ linux-2.5.24/include/linux/mmzone.h	Thu Jun 27 18:00:25 2002
@@ -88,16 +88,21 @@
 	 * rarely used fields:
 	 */
 	char			*name;
 	unsigned long		size;
 } zone_t;
 
-#define ZONE_DMA		0
-#define ZONE_NORMAL		1
-#define ZONE_HIGHMEM		2
-#define MAX_NR_ZONES		3
+enum zone_type {
+
+     ZONE_DMA,
+     ZONE_NORMAL,
+     ZONE_HIGHMEM,		
+     MAX_NR_ZONES,	
+
+};
+
 
 /*
  * One allocation request operates on a zonelist. A zonelist
  * is a list of zones, the first one is the 'goal' of the
  * allocation, the other zones are fallback zones, in decreasing
  * priority.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: enums
  2002-06-27 12:56 enums Manik Raina
@ 2002-06-27 13:03 ` Manik Raina
  2002-06-28  4:31 ` enums Manik Raina
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manik Raina @ 2002-06-27 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Manik Raina wrote:
> with enums, we dont have to increment MAX_NR_ZONES everytime a new one
	
	s/one/zonetype

> is added .
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: enums
  2002-06-27 12:56 enums Manik Raina
  2002-06-27 13:03 ` enums Manik Raina
@ 2002-06-28  4:31 ` Manik Raina
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manik Raina @ 2002-06-28  4:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: torvalds


	If no one has any objections, Can this be applied as a patch ?


Manik Raina wrote:
> 
> is there a particular reason we dislike constructs as attached in the
> diffs below ?
> with enums, we dont have to increment MAX_NR_ZONES everytime a new one
> is added .
> 
>   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff -u -r -U 6 cmp/include/linux/mmzone.h linux-2.5.24/include/linux/mmzone.h
> --- cmp/include/linux/mmzone.h  Fri Jun 21 04:23:42 2002
> +++ linux-2.5.24/include/linux/mmzone.h Thu Jun 27 18:00:25 2002
> @@ -88,16 +88,21 @@
>          * rarely used fields:
>          */
>         char                    *name;
>         unsigned long           size;
>  } zone_t;
> 
> -#define ZONE_DMA               0
> -#define ZONE_NORMAL            1
> -#define ZONE_HIGHMEM           2
> -#define MAX_NR_ZONES           3
> +enum zone_type {
> +
> +     ZONE_DMA,
> +     ZONE_NORMAL,
> +     ZONE_HIGHMEM,
> +     MAX_NR_ZONES,
> +
> +};
> +
> 
>  /*
>   * One allocation request operates on a zonelist. A zonelist
>   * is a list of zones, the first one is the 'goal' of the
>   * allocation, the other zones are fallback zones, in decreasing
>   * priority.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-28  4:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-27 12:56 enums Manik Raina
2002-06-27 13:03 ` enums Manik Raina
2002-06-28  4:31 ` enums Manik Raina

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox