From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: truncate_list_pages() page lock confusion and BUG
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 16:21:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D28CCF5.197E909C@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3C88087A.2030704@us.ibm.com
Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> I'm getting BUG()s from page_alloc.c:109 in 2.5.6-pre2
>
> truncate_list_pages() contains
>
> failed = TryLockPage(page);
>
> The page should always be locked when I get past there
>
> shortly after this, truncate_complete_page() can be called
>
> truncate_complete_page() calls:
> remove_inode_page(page);
> if (!PageLocked(page))
> PAGE_BUG(page);
> followed immediately by
> page_cache_release(page);
> calls __free_pages_ok(page, 0);
> if (PageLocked(page))
> BUG();
>
> So, it appears that when truncate_complete_page() is called, it is a BUG
> if the page is unlocked in remove_inode_page(), or locked in
> page_cache_release(). What am I missing? Actual bug follows:
>
The page should not be actually freed by truncate_complete_page().
See how truncate_list_pages() has bumped its refcount?
If the page is successfully truncated then the actual freeing
occurs in the page_cache_release() in truncate_list_pages(),
after the page has been unlocked.
Looks like the page refcount has suffered an extra decrement
somewhere. You're hitting this on the not-very-tested
generic_file_write() error path. But it all looks to be OK.
2.5.6 is awfully ancient.
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-07 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-08 0:40 truncate_list_pages() page lock confusion and BUG Dave Hansen
2002-07-07 23:21 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-07-07 23:19 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D28CCF5.197E909C@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox