* success with atomic kmap patches
@ 2002-07-19 2:15 Dave Hansen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2002-07-19 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel, Martin J. Bligh
I was using a little script to warm up my file cache for Specweb runs
when Martin Bligh said that it might be a good test of your kmap
patches. I ran 8 greps in parallel (1-per-cpu) through a 10-gigabyte
Specweb file set which is on a RAID array. The RAID is how I can do a
cold run in 3 minutes 30 sec :). Each grep works on a disjoint set of
data.
Here's a run with the cache already warm:
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrepwarm-2.5.26+lm+kmapfun-07-18-2002-18.24.38/
You'll probably only care about greptime.total, and lockstat. The
network stuff is cruft from when I actually run Specweb.
Here's a cold cache run:
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrep-cold-2.5.26+lm+kmapfun-07-18-2002-18.25.55/
Here are warm and cold, without the kmap patches
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrep-cold-2.5.26+lm-07-18-2002-18.46.27/
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrep-warm-2.5.26+lm-07-18-2002-18.56.09/
I would give you oprofile data, but it appears that NMIs wreak havoc
on a certain vendor's hardware. When oprofile is compiled in, my box
gets quite unstable.
--
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-07-19 2:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-19 2:15 success with atomic kmap patches Dave Hansen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox