From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:45:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:45:31 -0400 Received: from relay1.pair.com ([209.68.1.20]:24334 "HELO relay.pair.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:45:31 -0400 X-pair-Authenticated: 24.126.73.164 Message-ID: <3D38442B.FC307ADE@kegel.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:54:03 -0700 From: dank@kegel.com Reply-To: dank@kegel.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , george@mvista.com, "high-res-timers-discourse@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: high resolution timers in 2.5? (was: [2.6] The List, pass #2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Salisbury wrote: > On Friday 19 July 2002 00:47, Guillaume Boissiere wrote: > > Would be nice to have before feature freeze, but most likely 2.7: > > o High resolution timers > > this has been done for almost a year now, what is holding it up? I don't know, but it's about time. George Anziger should know. George, Have you submitted a high-resolution-timers patch to Linux for 2.5? I seem to recall he didn't like the patch when he first saw it, but that was so long ago presumably it's much cleaner now? - Dan