From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruption in 2.5.27?]
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:53:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D3DEC8D.E2BD71CB@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.44.0207240100150.2732-100000@localhost.localdomain
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, george anzinger wrote:
>
> > I just spent a month tracking down this issue. It comes
> > down to the slab allocater using per cpu data structures and
> > protecting them with a combination of interrupt disables and
> > spin_locks. Preemption is allowed (incorrectly) if
> > interrupts are off and preempt_count goes to zero on the
> > spin_unlock. [...]
>
> > The proposed fix is to catch the attempted preemption in
> > preempt_schedule() and just return if the interrupt system
> > is off. [...]
>
> this is most definitely not the correct fix ...
>
> i'm quite convinced that the fix is to avoid illegal preemption, not to
> work it around.
I like this. The only change I would make is to enable
interrupts in exit.c and entry.S where they are only enabled
under the debug condition now, (mostly I try to avoid
Heisenberg). I really do like the ability to track down
this problem by just turing on the debug option.
>
> i've written debugging code that caught and reported this slab.c bug
> within minutes.
Yeah, its easy when you know what to look for :)
> The code detects the irqs-off condition in schedule(). You
> can find it my latest irqlock patchset, at:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/remove-irqlock-patches/remove-irqlock-2.5.27-G3
>
> it fixes this and other related bugs as well.
>
> Changes in -G3:
>
> - slab.c needs to spin_unlock_no_resched(), instead of spin_unlock(). (It
> also has to check for preemption in the right spot.) This should fix
> the memory corruption.
>
> - irq_exit() needs to run softirqs if interrupts not active - in the
> previous patch it ran them when preempt_count() was 0, which is
> incorrect.
>
> - spinlock macros are updated to enable preemption after enabling
> interrupts. Besides avoiding false positive warnings, this also
>
> - fork.c has to call scheduler_tick() with preemption disabled -
> otherwise scheduler_tick()'s spin_unlock can preempt!
>
> - irqs_disabled() macro introduced.
>
> - [ all other local_irq_enable() or sti instances conditional on
> CONFIG_DEBUG_IRQ_SCHEDULE are to fix false positive warnings. ]
>
> Changes in -G0:
>
> - fix buggy in_softirq(). Fortunately the bug made the test broader,
> which didnt result in algorithmical breakage, just suboptimal
> performance.
>
> - move do_softirq() processing into irq_exit() => this also fixes the
> softirq processing bugs present in apic.c IRQ handlers that did not
> test for softirqs after irq_exit().
>
> - simplify local_bh_enable().
>
> Changes in -F9:
>
> - replace all instances of:
>
> local_save_flags(flags);
> local_irq_disable();
>
> with the shorter form of:
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
>
> about 30 files are affected by this change.
>
> Changes in -F8:
>
> - preempt/hardirq/softirq count separation, cleanups.
>
> - skbuff.c fix.
>
> - use irq_count() in scheduler_tick()
>
> Changes in -F3:
>
> - the entry.S cleanups/speedups by Oleg Nesterov.
>
> - a rather critical synchronize_irq() bugfix: if a driver frees an
> interrupt that is still being probed then synchronize_irq() locks up.
> This bug has caused a spurious boot-lockup on one of my testsystems,
> ifconfig would lock up trying to close eth0.
>
> - remove duplicate definitions from asm-i386/system.h, this fixes
> compiler warnings.
>
> Ingo
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-23 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-23 6:23 odd memory corruption in 2.5.27? Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-07-23 6:24 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-07-23 6:26 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-07-23 7:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-07-23 8:54 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-07-23 20:32 ` george anzinger
2002-07-23 20:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-23 23:28 ` [patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruption in 2.5.27?] Ingo Molnar
2002-07-23 23:53 ` george anzinger [this message]
2002-07-23 23:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-24 0:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-24 2:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-24 8:59 ` [patch] irqlock patch 2.5.27-H3 Ingo Molnar
2002-07-24 1:08 ` [patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruption in 2.5.27?] Robert Love
2002-07-24 3:13 ` [patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruption in2.5.27?] Andrew Morton
2002-07-24 3:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-24 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-24 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-24 8:00 ` [patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruptionin2.5.27?] Andrew Morton
2002-07-24 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-24 8:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-24 8:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-24 8:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-07-24 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-07-24 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-24 16:49 ` Robert Love
2002-07-24 20:56 ` [patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memorycorruptionin2.5.27?] george anzinger
2002-07-24 7:37 ` [patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruption in2.5.27?] Ingo Molnar
2002-07-24 6:52 ` odd memory corruption in 2.5.27? Zwane Mwaikambo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D3DEC8D.E2BD71CB@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox