From: Marcin Dalecki <dalecki@evision.ag>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpqarray broken since 2.5.19
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 16:27:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D3EB940.2010708@evision.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.SOL.4.30.0207241619020.15605-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
>
>
>>>Jens, the same is in cciss.c.
>>>Please remove locking from blk_stop_queue() (as you suggested) or intrduce
>>>unlocking in request_functions.
>>>
>>
>>Bartek I think the removal is just for reassertion that the
>>locking is the problem. You can't remove it easly from
>>blk_stop_queue() unless you make it mandatory that blk_stop_queue
>>has to be run with the lock already held. Or in other words
>>basically -> Don't use blk_stop_queue() outside of ->request_fn.
>
>
> Yep, that how it should be only used.
> However you are right these stop/start need some checking.
>
> About idea of using QUEUE_FLAG_STOPPED as IDE_BUSY right now is no go
> and will never be.
Hold on please. Becouse if you think one step further ->
not blocking blk_stop_queue() in do_request or more
precisely at places where the IDE_BUSY get's set 8-) you suddenly get
completely rid of it if you replace the "back-calls" to do_request() in
ata_irq_request() and ide_timer_expiry() with blk_start_queue()...
No direct manipulation whatsever.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-24 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-21 15:28 cpqarray broken since 2.5.19 Adam Kropelin
2002-07-24 13:39 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-24 14:07 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-24 14:09 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-24 14:11 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-24 14:19 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-24 14:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-24 14:44 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-24 14:46 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-24 15:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-24 14:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-24 14:27 ` Marcin Dalecki [this message]
2002-07-24 14:45 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-25 0:32 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-07-25 10:39 ` Jens Axboe
2002-07-26 0:30 ` Adam Kropelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D3EB940.2010708@evision.ag \
--to=dalecki@evision.ag \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@dalecki.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox