* 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17
@ 2002-07-27 18:15 kees
2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kees @ 2002-07-27 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi
I ran 2.4.19rc3 but my feeling is: Netscape 6.2 and (KDE3) Konqueror
showed a high number of spontaneous crashes. 256MB Ram xosview shows a few
megs of swap used. My pencam program didn't download pictures under
2.4.19rc3 and it does under 2.4.17.
Kees
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 2002-07-27 18:15 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 kees @ 2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan 2002-07-27 21:23 ` kees 2002-07-27 19:41 ` Adrian Bunk 2002-07-30 17:24 ` Greg KH 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: J Sloan @ 2002-07-27 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kees; +Cc: linux-kernel Hi, 2 comments just from an end-user perspective: 1. netscape 6.2 is nowhere near stable anyway - I'd recommend either netscape 7-pr1, or a recent mozilla (1.0, 1.1b or latest nightly) 2. Try one of the "enhanced" kernels, e,g, 2.4.19-rc3-ac2 or 2.4.19-rc3aa1 - they have bugfixes and performance enhancements Joe kees wrote: >Hi >I ran 2.4.19rc3 but my feeling is: Netscape 6.2 and (KDE3) Konqueror >showed a high number of spontaneous crashes. 256MB Ram xosview shows a few >megs of swap used. My pencam program didn't download pictures under >2.4.19rc3 and it does under 2.4.17. >Kees > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan @ 2002-07-27 21:23 ` kees 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: kees @ 2002-07-27 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: J Sloan; +Cc: linux-kernel Hi, I'll give it a try in the next days. tnx Kees On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, J Sloan wrote: > Hi, > > 2 comments just from an end-user perspective: > > 1. netscape 6.2 is nowhere near stable anyway - > I'd recommend either netscape 7-pr1, or a > recent mozilla (1.0, 1.1b or latest nightly) > > 2. Try one of the "enhanced" kernels, e,g, > 2.4.19-rc3-ac2 or 2.4.19-rc3aa1 - they have > bugfixes and performance enhancements > > Joe > > kees wrote: > > >Hi > >I ran 2.4.19rc3 but my feeling is: Netscape 6.2 and (KDE3) Konqueror > >showed a high number of spontaneous crashes. 256MB Ram xosview shows a few > >megs of swap used. My pencam program didn't download pictures under > >2.4.19rc3 and it does under 2.4.17. > >Kees > > > >- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 2002-07-27 18:15 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 kees 2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan @ 2002-07-27 19:41 ` Adrian Bunk 2002-07-27 21:22 ` kees 2002-07-30 17:24 ` Greg KH 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Adrian Bunk @ 2002-07-27 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kees; +Cc: linux-kernel On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, kees wrote: > Hi > I ran 2.4.19rc3 but my feeling is: Netscape 6.2 and (KDE3) Konqueror > showed a high number of spontaneous crashes. 256MB Ram xosview shows a few >... You say Netscape and Konqueror crash significantely more often when running 2.4.19-rc3 compared to running the same applications under 2.4.17? Let's try to track it down: - Do only Netscape/Konqueror crash or does X crash or does the whole computer crash? - Is there any error message when the browsers crash, if yes which? - Are there any suspicious messages in /var/log/syslog or /var/log/messages that might help in tracking this down? - Is your 2.4.17 a plain ftp.kernel.org kernel or a kernel shipped by your distribution? - Do you apply any patches to your kernels? - Do you ever load non-free kernel modules like e.g. the one from NVidia? If yes, are your problems reproducible if no non-free modules were _ever_ loaded since the last reboot? - Is there anything "special" or unusual with your machine (is it a laptop, root filesystem is on NFS or XFS, unusual hardware,...)? > Kees cu Adrian -- You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 2002-07-27 19:41 ` Adrian Bunk @ 2002-07-27 21:22 ` kees 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: kees @ 2002-07-27 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adrian Bunk; +Cc: linux-kernel Hi, On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, kees wrote: > > > Hi > > I ran 2.4.19rc3 but my feeling is: Netscape 6.2 and (KDE3) Konqueror > > showed a high number of spontaneous crashes. 256MB Ram xosview shows a few > >... > > You say Netscape and Konqueror crash significantely more often when > running 2.4.19-rc3 compared to running the same applications under 2.4.17? > > Let's try to track it down: > - Do only Netscape/Konqueror crash or does X crash or does the whole > computer crash? Only the apps, no X crash. > - Is there any error message when the browsers crash, if yes which? No messages > - Are there any suspicious messages in /var/log/syslog or > /var/log/messages that might help in tracking this down? No messages, taht was the fisrt thing I looked. > - Is your 2.4.17 a plain ftp.kernel.org kernel or a kernel shipped by your > distribution? Plain kernel from source tree > - Do you apply any patches to your kernels? Not this kernel(s) > - Do you ever load non-free kernel modules like e.g. the one from NVidia? No > If yes, are your problems reproducible if no non-free modules were > _ever_ loaded since the last reboot? > - Is there anything "special" or unusual with your machine (is it a > laptop, root filesystem is on NFS or XFS, unusual hardware,...)? SMP, MSI mobo Nothing that I can think of. Viewing webpages just did crash the app. very often , something that got away when switching back to 2.4.17 Java(?) > > > Kees > > cu > Adrian > > -- > > You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of > time explaining its a free country because its a police state. > Alan Cox > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 2002-07-27 18:15 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 kees 2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan 2002-07-27 19:41 ` Adrian Bunk @ 2002-07-30 17:24 ` Greg KH 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2002-07-30 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kees; +Cc: linux-kernel On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 08:15:10PM +0200, kees wrote: > My pencam program didn't download pictures under > 2.4.19rc3 and it does under 2.4.17. This is probably because you now have a USB kernel driver binding to your pencam device (stv680). Either unload it and then run your userspace program, or don't build that driver at all. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-30 17:22 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-07-27 18:15 2.4.19.rc3 vs 2.4.17 kees 2002-07-27 19:15 ` J Sloan 2002-07-27 21:23 ` kees 2002-07-27 19:41 ` Adrian Bunk 2002-07-27 21:22 ` kees 2002-07-30 17:24 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox