public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] automatic initcalls
@ 2002-07-27 20:22 Roman Zippel
  2002-07-28  3:31 ` Rusty Russell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Roman Zippel @ 2002-07-27 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Rusty Russell, Kai Germaschewski

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 617 bytes --]

Hi,

This patch is based on Rusty's patch, I did these changes to get it
working:
- I only look at modules which contain an initcall
- I only order initcalls of level 6 and 7
This makes the problem managable, so that everything what can be built
as module is also correctly initialized when compiled in. Other
initcalls still have to be ordered manually, but these are the minority
and so easier to manage.
I had to push up a few initcall levels and fix a bug in the IDE driver,
but otherwise it seems to work fine.
I also included my version of KBUILD_MODNAME (IMO my version should be a
bit faster :) ).

bye, Roman

[-- Attachment #2: initcall.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 10214 bytes --]

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.30
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.30 Makefile
--- Makefile	27 Jul 2002 12:34:13 -0000	1.1.1.30
+++ Makefile	27 Jul 2002 13:19:29 -0000
@@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ cmd_link_vmlinux = $(LD) $(LDFLAGS) $(LD
 		$(DRIVERS) \
 		$(NETWORKS) \
 		--end-group \
+		init/generated-initcalls.o \
 		-o vmlinux
 
 #	set -e makes the rule exit immediately on error
@@ -284,9 +285,25 @@ define rule_link_vmlinux
 	$(NM) vmlinux | grep -v '\(compiled\)\|\(\.o$$\)\|\( [aUw] \)\|\(\.\.ng$$\)\|\(LASH[RL]DI\)' | sort > System.map
 endef
 
-vmlinux: $(vmlinux-objs) FORCE
+init/generated-initcalls.c: .allinit.defs
+	set -e; echo '#include <linux/init.h>' > $@; \
+	sed -n < $< "s,^T ,,p" | sort > .defined.all; \
+	sed -n < $< "s,^U ,,p" | sort > .undefined.all; \
+	join -o "1.2 2.2" .defined.all .undefined.all | sort -u | tsort > .sorted.all; \
+	cut -d ' ' -f 3 < .allinit.defs | sort -u | grep -v -f .sorted.all > .other.all; \
+	cat .other.all >> .sorted.all; \
+	while read obj; do objdump -t $$obj | awk '/F \.initcall\.test/ { print "extern int " $$6 "(void);" }'; done < .other.all >> $@; \
+	echo 'initcall_t generated_initcalls[] = {' >> $@; \
+	while read obj; do objdump -t $$obj | awk '/F \.initcall\.test/ { print $$6 "," }'; done < .other.all >> $@; \
+	echo '0 };' >> $@
+
+vmlinux: $(vmlinux-objs) init/generated-initcalls.o FORCE
 	$(call if_changed_rule,link_vmlinux)
 
+.allinit.defs: $(CORE_FILES) $(LIBS) $(DRIVERS) $(NETWORKS)
+	rm -f $@; \
+	for s in $(dir $^); do ls -ld $$s; awk "{ print \$$1 \" \" \$$2 \" $$s\" \$$3 }" < $${s}.all_defs >> $@; done
+
 #	The actual objects are generated when descending, 
 #	make sure no implicit rule kicks in
 
@@ -586,6 +603,7 @@ defconfig:
 
 #	files removed with 'make clean'
 CLEAN_FILES += \
+	init/generated-initcalls.c .allinit.defs .defined.all .undefined.all .other.all .sorted.all \
 	include/linux/compile.h \
 	vmlinux System.map \
 	drivers/char/consolemap_deftbl.c drivers/video/promcon_tbl.c \
@@ -647,7 +665,7 @@ clean:	archclean
 	@echo 'Cleaning up'
 	@find . -name SCCS -prune -o -name BitKeeper -prune -o \
 		\( -name \*.[oas] -o -name core -o -name .\*.cmd -o \
-		-name .\*.tmp -o -name .\*.d \) -type f -print \
+		-name .\*.tmp -o -name .\*.d -o -name .\*[._]defs \) -type f -print \
 		| grep -v lxdialog/ | xargs rm -f
 	@rm -f $(CLEAN_FILES)
 	@$(MAKE) -f Documentation/DocBook/Makefile clean
Index: Rules.make
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/Rules.make,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.17
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.17 Rules.make
--- Rules.make	6 Jul 2002 00:33:37 -0000	1.1.1.17
+++ Rules.make	27 Jul 2002 18:56:39 -0000
@@ -105,9 +105,16 @@ multi-objs-m := $(foreach m, $(multi-use
 subdir-obj-y := $(foreach o,$(obj-y),$(if $(filter-out $(o),$(notdir $(o))),$(o)))
 
 # Replace multi-part objects by their individual parts, look at local dir only
-real-objs-y := $(foreach m, $(filter-out $(subdir-obj-y), $(obj-y)), $(if $($(m:.o=-objs)),$($(m:.o=-objs)),$(m))) $(EXTRA_TARGETS)
+mod-objs-y := $(filter-out $(subdir-obj-y), $(obj-y))
+real-objs-y := $(foreach m, $(mod-objs-y), $(if $($(m:.o=-objs)),$($(m:.o=-objs)),$(m))) $(EXTRA_TARGETS)
 real-objs-m := $(foreach m, $(obj-m), $(if $($(m:.o=-objs)),$($(m:.o=-objs)),$(m)))
 
+modnames := $(foreach m, $(sort $(mod-objs-y) $(objs-m)), $(if $($(m:.o=-objs)),$(foreach mm,$($(m:.o=-objs)),.$(mm).$(m))))
+
+modname = $(*F)
+
+$(multi-objs-y) $(multi-objs-m) : modname = $(patsubst .$@.%,%,$(filter .$@.%,$(modnames)))
+
 # Only build module versions for files which are selected to be built
 export-objs := $(filter $(export-objs),$(real-objs-y) $(real-objs-m))
 
@@ -168,6 +175,7 @@ $(addprefix $(MODVERDIR)/,$(export-objs:
 c_flags = -Wp,-MD,$(depfile) $(CFLAGS) $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS) \
 	  $(modkern_cflags) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS_$(*F).o) \
 	  -DKBUILD_BASENAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(*F))) \
+	  -DKBUILD_MODNAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(modname:.o=))) \
 	  $(export_flags) 
 
 # Our objects only depend on modversions.h, not on the individual .ver
@@ -248,7 +256,7 @@ endif
 #	The echo suppresses the "Nothing to be done for first_rule"
 first_rule: $(if $(KBUILD_BUILTIN),$(O_TARGET) $(L_TARGET) $(EXTRA_TARGETS)) \
 	    $(if $(KBUILD_MODULES),$(obj-m)) \
-	    sub_dirs
+	    sub_dirs .all_defs
 	@echo -n
 
 # Compile C sources (.c)
@@ -269,6 +277,7 @@ $(export-objs:.o=.lst): export_flags   :
 c_flags = -Wp,-MD,$(depfile) $(CFLAGS) $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS) \
 	  $(modkern_cflags) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS_$(*F).o) \
 	  -DKBUILD_BASENAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(*F))) \
+	  -DKBUILD_MODNAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(modname:.o=))) \
 	  $(export_flags) 
 
 quiet_cmd_cc_s_c = CC     $(echo_target)
@@ -294,6 +303,17 @@ cmd_cc_lst_c     = $(CC) $(c_flags) -g -
 
 %.lst: %.c FORCE
 	$(call if_changed_dep,cc_lst_c)
+
+.%.defs: %.o
+	if [ -n "$$(objdump -h $< | egrep '^[ ]*[0-9]+ \.initcall\.test')" ]; then \
+	nm $< | sed -n "s,^[0-9a-f ]*\([TU].*\),\1 $<,p" > $@; \
+	else > $@; fi
+
+$(subdir-y:%=%/.all_defs): sub_dirs
+
+.all_defs: $(mod-objs-y:%.o=.%.defs) $(subdir-y:%=%/.all_defs)
+	cat $(mod-objs-y:%.o=.%.defs) /dev/null > $@; \
+	for s in $(subdir-y); do awk "{ print \$$1 \" \" \$$2 \" $$s/\" \$$3 }" < $$s/.all_defs; done >> $@
 
 # Compile assembler sources (.S)
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index: drivers/ide/main.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/drivers/ide/main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.7
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.7 main.c
--- drivers/ide/main.c	27 Jul 2002 12:40:01 -0000	1.1.1.7
+++ drivers/ide/main.c	27 Jul 2002 13:19:30 -0000
@@ -1401,12 +1401,6 @@ static int __init ata_module_init(void)
 	/*
 	 * Initialize all device type driver modules.
 	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDISK
-	idedisk_init();
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD
-	ide_cdrom_init();
-#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDETAPE
 	idetape_init();
 #endif
Index: fs/dnotify.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/fs/dnotify.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.5
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.5 dnotify.c
--- fs/dnotify.c	27 Jul 2002 12:34:15 -0000	1.1.1.5
+++ fs/dnotify.c	27 Jul 2002 13:19:30 -0000
@@ -155,4 +155,4 @@ static int __init dnotify_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-module_init(dnotify_init)
+fs_initcall(dnotify_init);
Index: fs/fcntl.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/fs/fcntl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.8
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.8 fcntl.c
--- fs/fcntl.c	27 Jul 2002 12:34:14 -0000	1.1.1.8
+++ fs/fcntl.c	27 Jul 2002 13:19:30 -0000
@@ -568,4 +568,4 @@ static int __init fasync_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-module_init(fasync_init)
+fs_initcall(fasync_init);
Index: fs/locks.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/fs/locks.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.9
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.9 locks.c
--- fs/locks.c	27 Jul 2002 12:34:14 -0000	1.1.1.9
+++ fs/locks.c	27 Jul 2002 13:19:30 -0000
@@ -1936,4 +1936,4 @@ static int __init filelock_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-module_init(filelock_init)
+fs_initcall(filelock_init);
Index: include/linux/init.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/include/linux/init.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.6
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.6 init.h
--- include/linux/init.h	13 Jun 2002 00:22:57 -0000	1.1.1.6
+++ include/linux/init.h	27 Jul 2002 13:19:30 -0000
@@ -65,10 +65,16 @@ extern initcall_t __initcall_start, __in
 #define arch_initcall(fn)		__define_initcall("3",fn)
 #define subsys_initcall(fn)		__define_initcall("4",fn)
 #define fs_initcall(fn)			__define_initcall("5",fn)
-#define device_initcall(fn)		__define_initcall("6",fn)
-#define late_initcall(fn)		__define_initcall("7",fn)
 
-#define __initcall(fn) device_initcall(fn)
+#define device_initcall(fn)		__initcall(fn)
+#define late_initcall(fn)		__initcall(fn)
+
+#define __CAT3(a,b,c) a##b##c
+#define _CAT3(a,b,c) __CAT3(a,b,c)
+
+#define __initcall(fn)								\
+  int __attribute__((__section__ (".initcall.test"))) _CAT3(fn,_,KBUILD_MODNAME)(void) \
+       { return fn(); }
 
 #define __exitcall(fn)								\
 	static exitcall_t __exitcall_##fn __exit_call = fn
Index: init/main.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/init/main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.17
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.17 main.c
--- init/main.c	27 Jul 2002 12:34:42 -0000	1.1.1.17
+++ init/main.c	27 Jul 2002 13:19:31 -0000
@@ -464,6 +464,8 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
 
 struct task_struct *child_reaper = &init_task;
 
+extern initcall_t generated_initcalls[];
+
 static void __init do_initcalls(void)
 {
 	initcall_t *call;
@@ -473,6 +475,9 @@ static void __init do_initcalls(void)
 		(*call)();
 		call++;
 	} while (call < &__initcall_end);
+
+	for (call = generated_initcalls; *call; call++)
+		(*call)();
 
 	/* Make sure there is no pending stuff from the initcall sequence */
 	flush_scheduled_tasks();
Index: kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/kernel/sched.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.22
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.22 sched.c
--- kernel/sched.c	27 Jul 2002 12:34:42 -0000	1.1.1.22
+++ kernel/sched.c	27 Jul 2002 15:50:14 -0000
@@ -1910,7 +1910,7 @@ int __init migration_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-__initcall(migration_init);
+fs_initcall(migration_init);
 #endif
 
 extern void init_timervecs(void);
Index: kernel/softirq.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/kernel/softirq.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.12
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.12 softirq.c
--- kernel/softirq.c	27 Jul 2002 12:34:43 -0000	1.1.1.12
+++ kernel/softirq.c	27 Jul 2002 15:50:14 -0000
@@ -417,4 +417,4 @@ static __init int spawn_ksoftirqd(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-__initcall(spawn_ksoftirqd);
+fs_initcall(spawn_ksoftirqd);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-27 20:22 [PATCH] automatic initcalls Roman Zippel
@ 2002-07-28  3:31 ` Rusty Russell
  2002-07-28  3:51   ` Jeff Garzik
                     ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2002-07-28  3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roman Zippel; +Cc: linux-kernel, Kai Germaschewski, torvalds

In message <3D430123.739CA34D@linux-m68k.org> you write:
> - I only look at modules which contain an initcall
> - I only order initcalls of level 6 and 7

You don't seem to handle the ordering of initcalls within a module
though: see net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack.o for an example of
multiple inits which would be much better as separate initcalls.

The more I play with these magic approaches, the more I prefer an
explicit "Must be done after this" and "must be done before this":
otherwise we're going to need to keep adding new levels as we discover
something that doesn't fit in the magic 7.

Especially since you don't cover any of the really interesting cases.
Maybe if you could slowly extend it to cover the rest?  (Hah, I
know!).

> +init/generated-initcalls.c: .allinit.defs
> +	set -e; echo '#include <linux/init.h>' > $@; \
> +	sed -n < $< "s,^T ,,p" | sort > .defined.all; \

I think you mean something like:

	sed -n "s,^T ,,p" < $<

> -__initcall(spawn_ksoftirqd);
> +fs_initcall(spawn_ksoftirqd);

See, this is exacly the kind of thing that makes me doubt that the
current "magic 7 initcall levels" are useful in the long term 8(

Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-28  3:31 ` Rusty Russell
@ 2002-07-28  3:51   ` Jeff Garzik
  2002-07-28  4:47     ` Linus Torvalds
  2002-07-29  8:39     ` Ingo Oeser
  2002-07-28 12:18   ` Roman Zippel
                     ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2002-07-28  3:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Roman Zippel, linux-kernel, Kai Germaschewski, torvalds

Rusty Russell wrote:
> The more I play with these magic approaches, the more I prefer an
> explicit "Must be done after this" and "must be done before this":
> otherwise we're going to need to keep adding new levels as we discover
> something that doesn't fit in the magic 7.

I've always preferred a system where one simply lists dependencies [as 
you describe above], and some program actually does the hard work of 
chasing down all the initcall dependency checking and ordering.

Linus has traditionally poo-pooed this so I haven't put any work towards 
it... but I still think it's a good idea, and something we will 
eventually need as our system grows more complex.  If someone stood up 
and did the work, it should be pretty easy to generate a human-readable 
list of dependencies so we can check the ordering and make sure it's 
getting things right.

I wonder if there is some nifty ld feature I'm missing, that could do 
this for us...

	Jeff




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-28  3:51   ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2002-07-28  4:47     ` Linus Torvalds
  2002-07-28  8:50       ` Keith Adamson
                         ` (2 more replies)
  2002-07-29  8:39     ` Ingo Oeser
  1 sibling, 3 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2002-07-28  4:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Rusty Russell, Roman Zippel, linux-kernel, Kai Germaschewski



On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> I've always preferred a system where one simply lists dependencies [as
> you describe above], and some program actually does the hard work of
> chasing down all the initcall dependency checking and ordering.
>
> Linus has traditionally poo-pooed this so I haven't put any work towards
> it...

I don't hate the notion, but at the same time every time it comes up I
feel that there are reasonably simple ways to just avoid the ordering
problems.

Rusty had a script, but somebody complained about the speed of it. I
haven't looked at it myself.

		Linus


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-28  4:47     ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2002-07-28  8:50       ` Keith Adamson
  2002-07-28 18:59       ` Oliver Xymoron
  2002-07-29 23:39       ` Rusty Russell
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Keith Adamson @ 2002-07-28  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1325 bytes --]

On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 00:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > I've always preferred a system where one simply lists dependencies [as
> > you describe above], and some program actually does the hard work of
> > chasing down all the initcall dependency checking and ordering.
> >
> > Linus has traditionally poo-pooed this so I haven't put any work towards
> > it...
> 
> I don't hate the notion, but at the same time every time it comes up I
> feel that there are reasonably simple ways to just avoid the ordering
> problems.
> 
> Rusty had a script, but somebody complained about the speed of it. I
> haven't looked at it myself.
> 
> 		Linus

There is a relatively simple and fast recursive algorithm I've used
before to generating a sequence from a dependency list.
For initcall sequence it would be something like this (bash scripts
attached);

Dependency database: dependency_list_database
Main programs:       make_initcall_seqence.sh
Recursive routine:   generate_initcall.sh

Output sequence:     initcall_sequence

See attached files.

Normally I have error checking for bad dependencies (you can get into a
infinite recursive loop if for instance "foo1" needs "foo2" and also
"foo2" needs "foo1") ... but I didn't do it to keep the algorithm more
understandable. 

Keith

[-- Attachment #2: make_initcall_seqence.sh --]
[-- Type: text/x-sh, Size: 618 bytes --]

#!/bin/bash
#
#   make_initcall_seqence.sh - generate initcall sequence, file
#                          "initcall_sequence", from an initcall
#                          dependency list database, file
#                          "dependency_list_database"
#
# A random list of initcalls (will sequence them acording to the
# dependency database
initcall_list=$(sed 's,:.*$,,' dependency_list_database)
#
# Initialize the initcall_sequence file
rm -f initcall_sequence
touch initcall_sequence
#
# build the initcall_sequence file
for name in $initcall_list
do
        generate_initcall.sh $name
done

[-- Attachment #3: generate_initcall.sh --]
[-- Type: text/x-sh, Size: 1372 bytes --]

#!/bin/bash
#
#   generate_initcall.sh - Insert initcall into the "initcall_sequence"
#                          file in correct sequence
#
# First arg is the initcall
initcall=$1
#
# Get dependency initcall list for this initcall from the dependency
# database
dependency_initcall_list=$(
        grep '^'$initcall'[ :]' dependency_list_database | \
                sed 's,^.*:,,'
        )
#
#  function to find a missing initcall in initcall_sequence
function find_missing_initcall()
{
        need_initcall=""
        for name in $dependency_initcall_list
        do
                # test if initcall not done in initcall_sequence
                if [ "$(grep '^'$name'$' initcall_sequence)" = "" ]
                then
                        # return needed initcall
                        need_initcall=$name
                        break
                fi
        done
}
#
#  generate missing initcalls that this initcall needs done first
#
find_missing_initcall
while [ -n "$need_initcall" ]    # loop while adding missing initcalls
do
        generate_initcall.sh $need_initcall  # NOTE THE RECURSIVE CALL
        find_missing_initcall
done
#
#  Finally add this initcall to initcall_sequence (if missing)
if [ "$(grep '^'$initcall'$' initcall_sequence)" = "" ]
then
        echo $initcall >> initcall_sequence
fi

[-- Attachment #4: dependency_list_database --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 71 bytes --]

foo1 : foo2 foo3
foo2 : foo5
foo3 : foo2 foo4
foo4 :
foo5 : foo4 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-28  3:31 ` Rusty Russell
  2002-07-28  3:51   ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2002-07-28 12:18   ` Roman Zippel
  2002-07-29 23:46     ` Rusty Russell
  2002-07-28 21:59   ` [PATCH] automatic initcalls Kai Germaschewski
  2002-07-29 18:56   ` Patrick Mochel
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Roman Zippel @ 2002-07-28 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: linux-kernel, Kai Germaschewski, Linus Torvalds

Hi,

On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:

> > - I only look at modules which contain an initcall
> > - I only order initcalls of level 6 and 7
>
> You don't seem to handle the ordering of initcalls within a module
> though: see net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack.o for an example of
> multiple inits which would be much better as separate initcalls.

Actually I'm most interested in ordering "module_init()" and you can have
only one of them per module or how do you want to implement multiple
initcalls per module?

> Especially since you don't cover any of the really interesting cases.
> Maybe if you could slowly extend it to cover the rest?  (Hah, I
> know!).

I wouldn't mind if the remaining initcalls are converted to explicit
dependencies, but it's possible to sort automatically everything that can
be built as modules.

> > +init/generated-initcalls.c: .allinit.defs
> > +	set -e; echo '#include <linux/init.h>' > $@; \
> > +	sed -n < $< "s,^T ,,p" | sort > .defined.all; \
>
> I think you mean something like:
>
> 	sed -n "s,^T ,,p" < $<

Isn't that the same?

bye, Roman


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-28  4:47     ` Linus Torvalds
  2002-07-28  8:50       ` Keith Adamson
@ 2002-07-28 18:59       ` Oliver Xymoron
  2002-07-29 23:39       ` Rusty Russell
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Xymoron @ 2002-07-28 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds
  Cc: Jeff Garzik, Rusty Russell, Roman Zippel, linux-kernel,
	Kai Germaschewski

On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > I've always preferred a system where one simply lists dependencies [as
> > you describe above], and some program actually does the hard work of
> > chasing down all the initcall dependency checking and ordering.
> >
> > Linus has traditionally poo-pooed this so I haven't put any work towards
> > it...
>
> I don't hate the notion, but at the same time every time it comes up I
> feel that there are reasonably simple ways to just avoid the ordering
> problems.

The 'simple ways' are only simpler because they're taking advantage of
pre-existing (and undocumented) implicit ordering. The explicit
dependencies are probably less complex on the whole as it lets you take
out a ton of per-subsystem conditional cruft and replace it with a couple
lines of dependency info.

Given that sizeof(dependency info)==sizeof(missing documentation of
dependencies), it's clear that sizeof(dependency info + support + script)
< sizeof(current ordering code + conditional cruft + missing
documentation).

-- 
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-28  3:31 ` Rusty Russell
  2002-07-28  3:51   ` Jeff Garzik
  2002-07-28 12:18   ` Roman Zippel
@ 2002-07-28 21:59   ` Kai Germaschewski
  2002-07-29 18:56   ` Patrick Mochel
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Kai Germaschewski @ 2002-07-28 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Roman Zippel, linux-kernel, torvalds

On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:

> In message <3D430123.739CA34D@linux-m68k.org> you write:
> > - I only look at modules which contain an initcall
> > - I only order initcalls of level 6 and 7
> 
> You don't seem to handle the ordering of initcalls within a module
> though: see net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack.o for an example of
> multiple inits which would be much better as separate initcalls.

I'm not at all familiar with this code, but traditionally there is only 
one initcall per module - extending this to multiple initcalls with 
automated unwinding if one of those fails may be something to look into, 
but I don't think it has much to do with the current discussion (I doubt 
your patch does the unwinding, does it?)

> The more I play with these magic approaches, the more I prefer an
> explicit "Must be done after this" and "must be done before this":
> otherwise we're going to need to keep adding new levels as we discover
> something that doesn't fit in the magic 7.
> 
> Especially since you don't cover any of the really interesting cases.
> Maybe if you could slowly extend it to cover the rest?  (Hah, I
> know!).

I think when I commented on your initial patch, I said that I would make 
sense to use the existing ordering information where available, but it 
surely doesn't solve all the world's problems, so your patch would help a 
lot in cleaning up the ordering of the early initcalls of not modularized 
parts of the kernel.

For modules, it's obvious that we cannot insmod a module unless it's 
unresolved symbols can be resolved, i.e. the code which provides them has 
to be compiled-in or a module providing them has been loaded before. This 
is also the only way to determine the order of loading modules we have, so 
we guarantee that once all unresolved symbols are made available, all 
necessary initializations have run - most people probably don't think of 
it this way, because it comes natural anyway.

My point was that I don't think it's necessarily a good idea to duplicate 
this info - hisax.o (an ISDN hardware driver) needs "register_isdn()", 
which is provided by isdn.o. Insmoding isdn.o will of course also run the 
necessary initializations for making register_isdn() ready to be called 
from driver modules. It has to remain this way, since otherwise insmoding 
modules in the wrong order would crash the kernel. Now, in your scheme you 
would add an dependency like
	__initcall(hisax_init, initcall_after(isdn_init))
which duplicates this info. Which, as all duplicated info is redundant and 
has the potential for getting out of sync, different behavior for built-in 
vs. modular, etc.

On the other hand, we have complicated ordering during init, like 
(probably wrong as I put it, but you get the picture):

	pci_driver_init()
	pci_pcibios_init()
	pci_direct_init()
	pci_legacy_init()
	acpi_pci_init()
	pci_init()

These parts are not modularized, so the argument above doesn't help. Here, 
I think it would be a great improvement to be able to give dependencies on 
what has to be run when explicitly.

So the ideal solution would, IMO, look like:

Replace the __initcall levels by two constructs:
o __initcall(foo_init, init_after/...)
o module_init()

The __initcalls are called first, in the order explicitly given. Only
then, the functions declared as module_init() would get called, in an
order determined by the dependencies on exported symbols - i.e. that would
be comparable with compiling them as modules and insmoding them in just
this order.

I didn't have the time to look at the patches in depth yet, but it looks 
like we've got the two pieces and just have to put them together.

--Kai





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-28  3:51   ` Jeff Garzik
  2002-07-28  4:47     ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2002-07-29  8:39     ` Ingo Oeser
  2002-07-30  2:49       ` Keith Adamson
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Oeser @ 2002-07-29  8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik
  Cc: Rusty Russell, Roman Zippel, linux-kernel, Kai Germaschewski,
	torvalds

On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 11:51:32PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I've always preferred a system where one simply lists dependencies [as 
> you describe above], and some program actually does the hard work of 
> chasing down all the initcall dependency checking and ordering.

So we just need to build a directed graph, detect edges without
existing nodes (someone changed the initcall, we depend on) and
cycles (someone messed up the ordering) as errors, sort the
resulting graph toplogically and dump it as a sequence.

This is no rocket science and we have two tools, which does this
all for us (make and tsort, which create a warning for both cases).

The hard part is to CREATE all the dependencies and check and
double check them with the maintainers.

Regards

Ingo Oeser
-- 
Science is what we can tell a computer. Art is everything else. --- D.E.Knuth

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-28  3:31 ` Rusty Russell
                     ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2002-07-28 21:59   ` [PATCH] automatic initcalls Kai Germaschewski
@ 2002-07-29 18:56   ` Patrick Mochel
  2002-07-29 20:14     ` Roman Zippel
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Mochel @ 2002-07-29 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Roman Zippel, linux-kernel, Kai Germaschewski, torvalds


> > -__initcall(spawn_ksoftirqd);
> > +fs_initcall(spawn_ksoftirqd);
> 
> See, this is exacly the kind of thing that makes me doubt that the
> current "magic 7 initcall levels" are useful in the long term 8(

I agree that that is abusing the interface. WTF does spawn_ksoftirqd have 
to do with filesystems? 

The purpose of the initcall levels in the first place was to start 
removing the ugly conditional calls in init/main.c I looked at what was 
being called, and came up with names to describe what was being done at 
each phase. There happened to be seven of them.

I knew from the start that people would feel that they were more important 
that others, and leapfrog their initcalls before everyone else. We're 
egotistical; that's what we do. But remember, just because it's there, 
doesn't mean you have to use it. 

That said, it's been a while since I've really looked at it. I favor a 
mechanism for getting the ordering right. I don't really like having to 
specify the dependencies in the definitions; I think it's kinda ugly and 
wonder if there is an automatic way to resolve them. I don't have any 
ideas, nor the time to play with it, so it remains still just a pipe 
dream...

	-pat


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-29 18:56   ` Patrick Mochel
@ 2002-07-29 20:14     ` Roman Zippel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Roman Zippel @ 2002-07-29 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Patrick Mochel
  Cc: Rusty Russell, linux-kernel, Kai Germaschewski, Linus Torvalds

Hi,

On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Patrick Mochel wrote:

> > > -__initcall(spawn_ksoftirqd);
> > > +fs_initcall(spawn_ksoftirqd);
> >
> > See, this is exacly the kind of thing that makes me doubt that the
> > current "magic 7 initcall levels" are useful in the long term 8(
>
> I agree that that is abusing the interface. WTF does spawn_ksoftirqd have
> to do with filesystems?

Above is just a hack to get it working, I only moved it one level up,
instead of spending too much time on figuring out the complete
dependencies.

> The purpose of the initcall levels in the first place was to start
> removing the ugly conditional calls in init/main.c I looked at what was
> being called, and came up with names to describe what was being done at
> each phase. There happened to be seven of them.

I think we should separate module initialization from this, as these can
be automatically ordered, what the posted patch demonstrates.
The initcall mechanism would then only be needed to initialize core kernel
services, which can't be build as module.
I'm only interrested to get the module initialization right, because
otherwise I get problems with the new module interface. I want to avoid
to include an explicit ordering, but currently some modules make use of
that *_initcall is mapped to module_init if compiled as module (e.g. usb
or pcmcia).

bye, Roman


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-28  4:47     ` Linus Torvalds
  2002-07-28  8:50       ` Keith Adamson
  2002-07-28 18:59       ` Oliver Xymoron
@ 2002-07-29 23:39       ` Rusty Russell
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2002-07-29 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds
  Cc: Rusty Russell, Roman Zippel, linux-kernel, Kai Germaschewski

In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207272145050.6125-100000@home.transmeta.com> you wri
te:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > I've always preferred a system where one simply lists dependencies [as
> > you describe above], and some program actually does the hard work of
> > chasing down all the initcall dependency checking and ordering.
> >
> > Linus has traditionally poo-pooed this so I haven't put any work towards
> > it...
> 
> I don't hate the notion, but at the same time every time it comes up I
> feel that there are reasonably simple ways to just avoid the ordering
> problems.

I think that the best hope is a combination of Roman's module depends
work (based on Kai's "everything which is a module is trivial", and
Stephen and my first depends hack) and explicit depends.

Linkage ordering doesn't work in general, for things like "I want to
be initialized before the non-boot cpus have come up", but for
non-core code it's simple.

> Rusty had a script, but somebody complained about the speed of it. I
> haven't looked at it myself.

Yes, it'll slow the build by a few seconds: but if the linker ever
decides not to preserve ordering, we'll need it.  My original shell
script is suboptimal but we *don't* want the kernel build relying on
libbfd.

Roman and I will come up with something and send it to you later this
week.

Thanks!
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-28 12:18   ` Roman Zippel
@ 2002-07-29 23:46     ` Rusty Russell
  2002-07-30 23:04       ` [PATCH] automatic module_init ordering Roman Zippel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2002-07-29 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roman Zippel; +Cc: linux-kernel, Kai Germaschewski

In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207281358070.28515-100000@serv> you write:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> > > - I only look at modules which contain an initcall
> > > - I only order initcalls of level 6 and 7
> >
> > You don't seem to handle the ordering of initcalls within a module
> > though: see net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack.o for an example of
> > multiple inits which would be much better as separate initcalls.
> 
> Actually I'm most interested in ordering "module_init()" and you can have
> only one of them per module or how do you want to implement multiple
> initcalls per module?

Sorry, you are right.  That was a brain fart.

> > Especially since you don't cover any of the really interesting cases.
> > Maybe if you could slowly extend it to cover the rest?  (Hah, I
> > know!).
> 
> I wouldn't mind if the remaining initcalls are converted to explicit
> dependencies, but it's possible to sort automatically everything that can
> be built as modules.

Yes, I think we should do this: merge the two together.  You seem to
be in a coding frenzy: want to do the first cut?

I'll probably change my initdepends section format to make it shorter
and easier to parse.  But that change should be independent.

> > > +init/generated-initcalls.c: .allinit.defs
> > > +	set -e; echo '#include <linux/init.h>' > $@; \
> > > +	sed -n < $< "s,^T ,,p" | sort > .defined.all; \
> >
> > I think you mean something like:
> >
> > 	sed -n "s,^T ,,p" < $<
> 
> Isn't that the same?

Argh, not my day, clearly.  Let's pretend I didn't send that mail,
shall we?

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-29  8:39     ` Ingo Oeser
@ 2002-07-30  2:49       ` Keith Adamson
  2002-07-30  2:51         ` Keith Adamson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Keith Adamson @ 2002-07-30  2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Oeser
  Cc: Jeff Garzik, Rusty Russell, Roman Zippel, linux-kernel,
	Kai Germaschewski, torvalds

On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 04:39, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 11:51:32PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > I've always preferred a system where one simply lists dependencies [as 
> > you describe above], and some program actually does the hard work of 
> > chasing down all the initcall dependency checking and ordering.
> 
> So we just need to build a directed graph, detect edges without
> existing nodes (someone changed the initcall, we depend on) and
> cycles (someone messed up the ordering) as errors, sort the
> resulting graph toplogically and dump it as a sequence.
> 
> This is no rocket science and we have two tools, which does this
> all for us (make and tsort, which create a warning for both cases).
> 
> The hard part is to CREATE all the dependencies and check and
> double check them with the maintainers.
> 

I definitely agree the easy part is the algorithm and the hard part is
creating the dependency list.  For instance, attached is a small
algorithm that does the initcall sequencing at run time.

The API is is simple, you just register your initcall with a list of
critical initcalls you need to be run before yours (not all, just the
ones you definitely need to be run first).  Then the ordering of the all
the initcalls are sequenced at run time.  This way you don't have to
worry about link ordering or code ordering of your initcalls during
make/compile/link.  All initcall ordering is done during boot.  

This really frees you from module inter-dependencies because is doesn't
mater in what order you register you initcalls.  You only need register
them with a list the critical modules that need to be initialized before
yours.

The API also provides that you can register more than one initcall for
your module with a different set of critical modules that must be run
first.

This should be relative easy to add to the kernel, as you don't have to
modify any of the existing initcalls.  You do need to remove all
existing calls to them and register them instead with the new API.

Untar and "cd init; cc *.c; ./a.out"

Four example modules register their initcalls, "foo1, foo2, foo3, foo4",
and then the main routine sequences them at run time.  

Regards, Keith




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic initcalls
  2002-07-30  2:49       ` Keith Adamson
@ 2002-07-30  2:51         ` Keith Adamson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Keith Adamson @ 2002-07-30  2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Keith Adamson
  Cc: Ingo Oeser, Jeff Garzik, Rusty Russell, Roman Zippel,
	linux-kernel, Kai Germaschewski, torvalds

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2387 bytes --]

On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 22:49, Keith Adamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 04:39, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 11:51:32PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > I've always preferred a system where one simply lists dependencies [as 
> > > you describe above], and some program actually does the hard work of 
> > > chasing down all the initcall dependency checking and ordering.
> > 
> > So we just need to build a directed graph, detect edges without
> > existing nodes (someone changed the initcall, we depend on) and
> > cycles (someone messed up the ordering) as errors, sort the
> > resulting graph toplogically and dump it as a sequence.
> > 
> > This is no rocket science and we have two tools, which does this
> > all for us (make and tsort, which create a warning for both cases).
> > 
> > The hard part is to CREATE all the dependencies and check and
> > double check them with the maintainers.
> > 
> 
> I definitely agree the easy part is the algorithm and the hard part is
> creating the dependency list.  For instance, attached is a small
> algorithm that does the initcall sequencing at run time.
> 
> The API is is simple, you just register your initcall with a list of
> critical initcalls you need to be run before yours (not all, just the
> ones you definitely need to be run first).  Then the ordering of the all
> the initcalls are sequenced at run time.  This way you don't have to
> worry about link ordering or code ordering of your initcalls during
> make/compile/link.  All initcall ordering is done during boot.  
> 
> This really frees you from module inter-dependencies because is doesn't
> mater in what order you register you initcalls.  You only need register
> them with a list the critical modules that need to be initialized before
> yours.
> 
> The API also provides that you can register more than one initcall for
> your module with a different set of critical modules that must be run
> first.
> 
> This should be relative easy to add to the kernel, as you don't have to
> modify any of the existing initcalls.  You do need to remove all
> existing calls to them and register them instead with the new API.
> 
> Untar and "cd init; cc *.c; ./a.out"
> 
> Four example modules register their initcalls, "foo1, foo2, foo3, foo4",
> and then the main routine sequences them at run time.  
> 
> Regards, Keith
> 
> 
Forgot the attachment :)




[-- Attachment #2: init_020729.tar --]
[-- Type: application/x-tar, Size: 10240 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] automatic module_init ordering
  2002-07-29 23:46     ` Rusty Russell
@ 2002-07-30 23:04       ` Roman Zippel
  2002-07-31  2:33         ` Kai Germaschewski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Roman Zippel @ 2002-07-30 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: linux-kernel, Kai Germaschewski

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 347 bytes --]

Hi,

Rusty Russell wrote:

> Yes, I think we should do this: merge the two together.  You seem to
> be in a coding frenzy: want to do the first cut?

I attached a new version, that only orders module_init(). I did some
small compile performance tests and I could only see a few seconds
difference, so the overhead should be negligible.

bye, Roman

[-- Attachment #2: initcall.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 9187 bytes --]

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.30
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.30 Makefile
--- Makefile	27 Jul 2002 12:34:13 -0000	1.1.1.30
+++ Makefile	30 Jul 2002 21:57:02 -0000
@@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ cmd_link_vmlinux = $(LD) $(LDFLAGS) $(LD
 		$(DRIVERS) \
 		$(NETWORKS) \
 		--end-group \
+		init/generated-initcalls.o \
 		-o vmlinux
 
 #	set -e makes the rule exit immediately on error
@@ -284,9 +285,30 @@ define rule_link_vmlinux
 	$(NM) vmlinux | grep -v '\(compiled\)\|\(\.o$$\)\|\( [aUw] \)\|\(\.\.ng$$\)\|\(LASH[RL]DI\)' | sort > System.map
 endef
 
-vmlinux: $(vmlinux-objs) FORCE
+init/generated-initcalls.c: .allbuiltin_mods
+	set -e; \
+	while read obj; do $(NM) $$obj | sed -n "s,^[0-9a-f ]*\([UTD] .*\),\1 $$obj,p"; done < $< | \
+	awk '/^U/ { print $$2 " " $$3 | "sort -u > .undefined.tmp" }; \
+	     /^[TD]/ { print $$2 " " $$3 | "sort -u > .defined.tmp" }'; \
+	join -o "1.2 2.2" .defined.tmp .undefined.tmp | sort -u | tsort > .sorted.tmp; \
+	grep -v -f .sorted.tmp < $< > .other.tmp; \
+	cat .other.tmp >> .sorted.tmp; \
+	while read obj; do \
+	  call=$$($(OBJDUMP) -t $$obj | awk '/F \.initcall\.module/ { print $$6 }' ); \
+	  defs="$$defs extern int $$call(void);"; arr="$$arr $$call,"; \
+	done < .sorted.tmp; \
+	echo "#include <linux/init.h>" > $@; \
+	echo $$defs >> $@; \
+	echo 'initcall_t generated_initcalls[] = {' >> $@; \
+	echo $$arr >> $@; \
+	echo '0 };' >> $@
+
+vmlinux: $(vmlinux-objs) init/generated-initcalls.o FORCE
 	$(call if_changed_rule,link_vmlinux)
 
+.allbuiltin_mods: $(CORE_FILES) $(LIBS) $(DRIVERS) $(NETWORKS)
+	for s in $(dir $^); do sed "s,^,$$s," < $${s}.builtin_mods; done > $@
+
 #	The actual objects are generated when descending, 
 #	make sure no implicit rule kicks in
 
@@ -586,6 +608,7 @@ defconfig:
 
 #	files removed with 'make clean'
 CLEAN_FILES += \
+	init/generated-initcalls.c .allbuiltin_mods \
 	include/linux/compile.h \
 	vmlinux System.map \
 	drivers/char/consolemap_deftbl.c drivers/video/promcon_tbl.c \
@@ -647,7 +670,7 @@ clean:	archclean
 	@echo 'Cleaning up'
 	@find . -name SCCS -prune -o -name BitKeeper -prune -o \
 		\( -name \*.[oas] -o -name core -o -name .\*.cmd -o \
-		-name .\*.tmp -o -name .\*.d \) -type f -print \
+		-name .\*.tmp -o -name .\*.d -o -name .builtin_mods \) -type f -print \
 		| grep -v lxdialog/ | xargs rm -f
 	@rm -f $(CLEAN_FILES)
 	@$(MAKE) -f Documentation/DocBook/Makefile clean
Index: Rules.make
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/Rules.make,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.17
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.17 Rules.make
--- Rules.make	6 Jul 2002 00:33:37 -0000	1.1.1.17
+++ Rules.make	30 Jul 2002 18:37:47 -0000
@@ -105,9 +105,16 @@ multi-objs-m := $(foreach m, $(multi-use
 subdir-obj-y := $(foreach o,$(obj-y),$(if $(filter-out $(o),$(notdir $(o))),$(o)))
 
 # Replace multi-part objects by their individual parts, look at local dir only
-real-objs-y := $(foreach m, $(filter-out $(subdir-obj-y), $(obj-y)), $(if $($(m:.o=-objs)),$($(m:.o=-objs)),$(m))) $(EXTRA_TARGETS)
+mod-objs-y := $(filter-out $(subdir-obj-y), $(obj-y))
+real-objs-y := $(foreach m, $(mod-objs-y), $(if $($(m:.o=-objs)),$($(m:.o=-objs)),$(m))) $(EXTRA_TARGETS)
 real-objs-m := $(foreach m, $(obj-m), $(if $($(m:.o=-objs)),$($(m:.o=-objs)),$(m)))
 
+modnames := $(foreach m, $(sort $(mod-objs-y) $(objs-m)), $(if $($(m:.o=-objs)),$(foreach mm,$($(m:.o=-objs)),.$(mm).$(m))))
+
+modname = $(*F)
+
+$(multi-objs-y) $(multi-objs-m) : modname = $(patsubst .$@.%,%,$(filter .$@.%,$(modnames)))
+
 # Only build module versions for files which are selected to be built
 export-objs := $(filter $(export-objs),$(real-objs-y) $(real-objs-m))
 
@@ -168,6 +175,7 @@ $(addprefix $(MODVERDIR)/,$(export-objs:
 c_flags = -Wp,-MD,$(depfile) $(CFLAGS) $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS) \
 	  $(modkern_cflags) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS_$(*F).o) \
 	  -DKBUILD_BASENAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(*F))) \
+	  -DKBUILD_MODNAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(modname:.o=))) \
 	  $(export_flags) 
 
 # Our objects only depend on modversions.h, not on the individual .ver
@@ -248,7 +256,7 @@ endif
 #	The echo suppresses the "Nothing to be done for first_rule"
 first_rule: $(if $(KBUILD_BUILTIN),$(O_TARGET) $(L_TARGET) $(EXTRA_TARGETS)) \
 	    $(if $(KBUILD_MODULES),$(obj-m)) \
-	    sub_dirs
+	    sub_dirs .builtin_mods
 	@echo -n
 
 # Compile C sources (.c)
@@ -269,6 +277,7 @@ $(export-objs:.o=.lst): export_flags   :
 c_flags = -Wp,-MD,$(depfile) $(CFLAGS) $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS) \
 	  $(modkern_cflags) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS_$(*F).o) \
 	  -DKBUILD_BASENAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(*F))) \
+	  -DKBUILD_MODNAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(modname:.o=))) \
 	  $(export_flags) 
 
 quiet_cmd_cc_s_c = CC     $(echo_target)
@@ -294,6 +303,14 @@ cmd_cc_lst_c     = $(CC) $(c_flags) -g -
 
 %.lst: %.c FORCE
 	$(call if_changed_dep,cc_lst_c)
+
+$(subdir-y:%=%/.builtin_mods): sub_dirs
+
+.builtin_mods: $(mod-objs-y) $(subdir-y:%=%/.builtin_mods)
+	for o in $(mod-objs-y); do \
+	if [ -n "$$($(OBJDUMP) -h $$o | grep .initcall.module)" ]; then echo $$o; fi \
+	done > $@; \
+	for s in $(subdir-y); do sed "s,^,$$s/," < $$s/.builtin_mods; done >> $@
 
 # Compile assembler sources (.S)
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index: drivers/ide/main.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/drivers/ide/main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.7
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.7 main.c
--- drivers/ide/main.c	27 Jul 2002 12:40:01 -0000	1.1.1.7
+++ drivers/ide/main.c	30 Jul 2002 18:37:47 -0000
@@ -1397,23 +1397,6 @@ static int __init ata_module_init(void)
 	}
 # endif
 #endif
-
-	/*
-	 * Initialize all device type driver modules.
-	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDISK
-	idedisk_init();
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD
-	ide_cdrom_init();
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDETAPE
-	idetape_init();
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEFLOPPY
-	idefloppy_init();
-#endif
-
 	initializing = 0;
 
 	register_reboot_notifier(&ata_notifier);
Index: fs/dnotify.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/fs/dnotify.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.5
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.5 dnotify.c
--- fs/dnotify.c	27 Jul 2002 12:34:15 -0000	1.1.1.5
+++ fs/dnotify.c	30 Jul 2002 18:37:47 -0000
@@ -155,4 +155,4 @@ static int __init dnotify_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-module_init(dnotify_init)
+fs_initcall(dnotify_init);
Index: fs/fcntl.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/fs/fcntl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.8
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.8 fcntl.c
--- fs/fcntl.c	27 Jul 2002 12:34:14 -0000	1.1.1.8
+++ fs/fcntl.c	30 Jul 2002 18:37:47 -0000
@@ -568,4 +568,4 @@ static int __init fasync_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-module_init(fasync_init)
+fs_initcall(fasync_init);
Index: fs/locks.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/fs/locks.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.9
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.9 locks.c
--- fs/locks.c	27 Jul 2002 12:34:14 -0000	1.1.1.9
+++ fs/locks.c	30 Jul 2002 18:37:47 -0000
@@ -1936,4 +1936,4 @@ static int __init filelock_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-module_init(filelock_init)
+fs_initcall(filelock_init);
Index: include/linux/init.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/include/linux/init.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.6
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.6 init.h
--- include/linux/init.h	13 Jun 2002 00:22:57 -0000	1.1.1.6
+++ include/linux/init.h	30 Jul 2002 18:37:47 -0000
@@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ extern struct kernel_param __setup_start
 #define __FINIT		.previous
 #define __INITDATA	.section	".data.init","aw"
 
+#define ___concat(a,b)	a##b
+#define __concat(a,b)	___concat(a,b)
+
 /**
  * module_init() - driver initialization entry point
  * @x: function to be run at kernel boot time or module insertion
@@ -116,7 +119,10 @@ extern struct kernel_param __setup_start
  * routine with init_module() which is used by insmod and
  * modprobe when the driver is used as a module.
  */
-#define module_init(x)	__initcall(x);
+#define module_init(x)					\
+int __attribute__((__section__ (".initcall.module")))	\
+__concat(init_module_,KBUILD_MODNAME)(void)		\
+{ return x(); }
 
 /**
  * module_exit() - driver exit entry point
Index: kernel/module.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/src/cvsroot/linux-2.5/kernel/module.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.3
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.3 module.c
--- kernel/module.c	14 Apr 2002 20:01:36 -0000	1.1.1.3
+++ kernel/module.c	30 Jul 2002 22:23:53 -0000
@@ -252,6 +252,19 @@ void __init init_modules(void)
 	arch_init_modules(&kernel_module);
 }
 
+extern initcall_t generated_initcalls[];
+
+static int __init init_builtin_modules(void)
+{
+	initcall_t *call;
+
+	for (call = generated_initcalls; *call; call++)
+		(*call)();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+device_initcall(init_builtin_modules);
+
 /*
  * Copy the name of a module from user space.
  */

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic module_init ordering
  2002-07-30 23:04       ` [PATCH] automatic module_init ordering Roman Zippel
@ 2002-07-31  2:33         ` Kai Germaschewski
  2002-07-31  3:26           ` Rusty Russell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Kai Germaschewski @ 2002-07-31  2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roman Zippel; +Cc: Rusty Russell, linux-kernel

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Roman Zippel wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> > Yes, I think we should do this: merge the two together.  You seem to
> > be in a coding frenzy: want to do the first cut?
> 
> I attached a new version, that only orders module_init(). I did some
> small compile performance tests and I could only see a few seconds
> difference, so the overhead should be negligible.

Okay, here's a suggestion to slightly reorganize the KBUILD_MODNAME
part in Rules.make.

- Some sreorganization of the c_flags since they're needed for
  generating modversions (.ver) and compiling
- Use the right KBUILD_MODNAME also when the user just wants a .i/.s/.lst 
  file for debugging and also when generating modversions
- It looks like with your current approach you can't have a ',' or '-' in
  KBUILD_MODNAME - however, that means that KBUILD_MODNAME is not quite
  right for passing module parameters for built-in modules on the command
  line, it would be confusing to pass parameters for ide-cd as 
  ide_cd.foo=whatever. So that part could use a little more thought.
- If you think your module_names trick makes a noticable difference, feel
  free to re-add it.
- It's possible that objects are linked into more than one module - I 
  suppose this shouldn't be a problem, since these objects hopefully
  don't have a module_init() nor do they export symbols. Not sure if your
  patch did handle this.

--Kai


===== Rules.make 1.68 vs edited =====
--- 1.68/Rules.make	Mon Jul 29 14:55:41 2002
+++ edited/Rules.make	Tue Jul 30 21:27:46 2002
@@ -95,11 +95,15 @@
 multi-used-y := $(filter-out $(list-multi),$(__multi-used-y))
 multi-used-m := $(filter-out $(list-multi),$(__multi-used-m))
 
+multi-used   := $(multi-used-y) $(multi-used-m)
+
 # Build list of the parts of our composite objects, our composite
 # objects depend on those (obviously)
 multi-objs-y := $(foreach m, $(multi-used-y), $($(m:.o=-objs)))
 multi-objs-m := $(foreach m, $(multi-used-m), $($(m:.o=-objs)))
 
+multi-objs   := $(multi-objs-y) $(multi-objs-m)
+
 # $(subdir-obj-y) is the list of objects in $(obj-y) which do not live
 # in the local directory
 subdir-obj-y := $(foreach o,$(obj-y),$(if $(filter-out $(o),$(notdir $(o))),$(o)))
@@ -115,6 +119,23 @@
 # contain a comma
 depfile = $(subst $(comma),_,$(@D)/.$(@F).d)
 
+# These flags are needed for modversions and compiling, so we define them here
+# already
+# $(modname_flags) #defines KBUILD_MODNAME as the name of the module it will 
+# end up in (or would, if it gets compiled in)
+# Note: It's possible that one object gets potentially linked into more
+#       than one module. In that case KBUILD_MODNAME will be set to foo_bar,
+#       where foo and bar are the name of the modules.
+basename_flags = -DKBUILD_BASENAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(*F)))
+modname_flags  = -DKBUILD_MODNAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(modname)))
+c_flags        = -Wp,-MD,$(depfile) $(CFLAGS) $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS) \
+	         $(modkern_cflags) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS_$(*F).o) \
+	         $(basename_flags) $(modname_flags) $(export_flags) 
+
+# Finds the multi-part object the current object will be linked into
+modname-multi = $(subst $(space),_,$(strip $(foreach m,$(multi-used),\
+		$(if $(filter $(*F).o,$($(m:.o=-objs))),$(m:.o=)))))
+
 # We're called for one of three purposes:
 # o fastdep: build module version files (.ver) for $(export-objs) in
 #   the current directory
@@ -164,11 +185,10 @@
 $(addprefix $(MODVERDIR)/,$(real-objs-y:.o=.ver)): modkern_cflags := $(CFLAGS_KERNEL)
 $(addprefix $(MODVERDIR)/,$(real-objs-m:.o=.ver)): modkern_cflags := $(CFLAGS_MODULE)
 $(addprefix $(MODVERDIR)/,$(export-objs:.o=.ver)): export_flags   := -D__GENKSYMS__
+# Default for not multi-part modules
+modname = $(*F)
 
-c_flags = -Wp,-MD,$(depfile) $(CFLAGS) $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS) \
-	  $(modkern_cflags) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS_$(*F).o) \
-	  -DKBUILD_BASENAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(*F))) \
-	  $(export_flags) 
+$(addprefix $(MODVERDIR)/,$(multi-objs:.o=.ver)) : modname = $(modname-multi)
 
 # Our objects only depend on modversions.h, not on the individual .ver
 # files (fix-dep filters them), so touch modversions.h if any of the .ver
@@ -259,6 +279,7 @@
 
 $(real-objs-m)        : modkern_cflags := $(CFLAGS_MODULE)
 $(real-objs-m:.o=.i)  : modkern_cflags := $(CFLAGS_MODULE)
+$(real-objs-m:.o=.s)  : modkern_cflags := $(CFLAGS_MODULE)
 $(real-objs-m:.o=.lst): modkern_cflags := $(CFLAGS_MODULE)
 
 $(export-objs)        : export_flags   := $(EXPORT_FLAGS)
@@ -266,10 +287,13 @@
 $(export-objs:.o=.s)  : export_flags   := $(EXPORT_FLAGS)
 $(export-objs:.o=.lst): export_flags   := $(EXPORT_FLAGS)
 
-c_flags = -Wp,-MD,$(depfile) $(CFLAGS) $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS) \
-	  $(modkern_cflags) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS_$(*F).o) \
-	  -DKBUILD_BASENAME=$(subst $(comma),_,$(subst -,_,$(*F))) \
-	  $(export_flags) 
+# Default for not multi-part modules
+modname = $(*F)
+
+$(multi-objs)         : modname = $(modname-multi)
+$(multi-objs:.o=.i)   : modname = $(modname-multi)
+$(multi-objs:.o=.s)   : modname = $(modname-multi)
+$(multi-objs:.o=.lst) : modname = $(modname-multi)
 
 quiet_cmd_cc_s_c = CC     $(echo_target)
 cmd_cc_s_c       = $(CC) $(c_flags) -S -o $@ $< 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic module_init ordering
  2002-07-31  2:33         ` Kai Germaschewski
@ 2002-07-31  3:26           ` Rusty Russell
  2002-07-31 17:06             ` Kai Germaschewski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2002-07-31  3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kai Germaschewski; +Cc: Roman Zippel, linux-kernel

In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207302110570.19799-100000@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu> y
ou write:
> - It looks like with your current approach you can't have a ',' or '-' in
>   KBUILD_MODNAME - however, that means that KBUILD_MODNAME is not quite
>   right for passing module parameters for built-in modules on the command
>   line, it would be confusing to pass parameters for ide-cd as 
>   ide_cd.foo=whatever. So that part could use a little more thought.

My PARAM code actually maps - to _ in parameter parsing, for exactly
this reason.  And only a complete idiot would put , in a module name,
so I don't care 8)

> - It's possible that objects are linked into more than one module - I 
>   suppose this shouldn't be a problem, since these objects hopefully
>   don't have a module_init() nor do they export symbols. Not sure if your
>   patch did handle this.

There's one piece of code I know which is linked in three places, and
has a module parameter (net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c, linked
into ipfwadm.o ipchains.o and ip_conntrack.o.

As it happens, the configuration doesn't allow more than one to be
built in (they can all be modules though), so it's not actually a
problem even after parameter unification.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic module_init ordering
  2002-07-31  3:26           ` Rusty Russell
@ 2002-07-31 17:06             ` Kai Germaschewski
  2002-07-31 23:28               ` Rusty Russell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Kai Germaschewski @ 2002-07-31 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Roman Zippel, linux-kernel

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:

> My PARAM code actually maps - to _ in parameter parsing, for exactly
> this reason.  And only a complete idiot would put , in a module name,
> so I don't care 8)

Tell that to the author of 53c7,8xx.o ;)

> > - It's possible that objects are linked into more than one module - I 
> >   suppose this shouldn't be a problem, since these objects hopefully
> >   don't have a module_init() nor do they export symbols. Not sure if your
> >   patch did handle this.
> 
> There's one piece of code I know which is linked in three places, and
> has a module parameter (net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c, linked
> into ipfwadm.o ipchains.o and ip_conntrack.o.
> 
> As it happens, the configuration doesn't allow more than one to be
> built in (they can all be modules though), so it's not actually a
> problem even after parameter unification.

Hmmh, I think that'll need some testing. It will be fine if only one of 
the three is "y", the others being "n/undef". However, it looks like it's 
possible to have sth like "m/m/y", which would go wrong with the current 
approach.

--Kai



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] automatic module_init ordering
  2002-07-31 17:06             ` Kai Germaschewski
@ 2002-07-31 23:28               ` Rusty Russell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2002-07-31 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kai Germaschewski; +Cc: Roman Zippel, linux-kernel

In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207311201000.19799-100000@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu> y
ou write:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> > My PARAM code actually maps - to _ in parameter parsing, for exactly
> > this reason.  And only a complete idiot would put , in a module name,
> > so I don't care 8)
> 
> Tell that to the author of 53c7,8xx.o ;)

Consider that done.

> > As it happens, the configuration doesn't allow more than one to be
> > built in (they can all be modules though), so it's not actually a
> > problem even after parameter unification.
> 
> Hmmh, I think that'll need some testing. It will be fine if only one of 
> the three is "y", the others being "n/undef". However, it looks like it's 
> possible to have sth like "m/m/y", which would go wrong with the current 
> approach.

That's a bug.  That configuration makes no sense (the modules won't
load).  Hmmm... more Config.in complexity coming up 8(

Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-31 23:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-27 20:22 [PATCH] automatic initcalls Roman Zippel
2002-07-28  3:31 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-28  3:51   ` Jeff Garzik
2002-07-28  4:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-28  8:50       ` Keith Adamson
2002-07-28 18:59       ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-07-29 23:39       ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-29  8:39     ` Ingo Oeser
2002-07-30  2:49       ` Keith Adamson
2002-07-30  2:51         ` Keith Adamson
2002-07-28 12:18   ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-29 23:46     ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-30 23:04       ` [PATCH] automatic module_init ordering Roman Zippel
2002-07-31  2:33         ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-07-31  3:26           ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-31 17:06             ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-07-31 23:28               ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-28 21:59   ` [PATCH] automatic initcalls Kai Germaschewski
2002-07-29 18:56   ` Patrick Mochel
2002-07-29 20:14     ` Roman Zippel

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox