From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rick Lindsley <ricklind@us.ibm.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Push BKL into chrdev opens
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 11:02:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D4977C3.7050806@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3D490BF2.2000709@us.ibm.com
Dave Hansen wrote:
> This patch adds the BKL to each character device's open() function. The
> BKL will remain in chrdev_open() until the module unload races are
> fixed, but this makes it unnecessary there for any other reason.
Greg KH noticed that I'd touched USB, and wondered about the places
where get/put_fops were used to make sure the driver gets called
directly the next time, instead of going through the subsystem. I
don't believe that the BKL is needed in the devices in this case, only
in the subsystem itself.
During inode init (init_special_inode) f_op is set to def_chr_fops,
which contains chrdev_open
First open of char device file:
if (f->f_op && f->f_op->open) {
error = f->f_op->open(inode,f);
}
The ->open() call goes to chrdev_open
USB is determined to handle the device
BKL is grabbed in chrdev_open
generic USB ->open() called (usb_open())
driver ->open() is called
f_op is replaced with the driver's f_op struct.
BKL is released
Subsequent calls:
if (f->f_op && f->f_op->open) {
error = f->f_op->open(inode,f);
}
->open() goes directly to driver. No BKL grabbed after first call.
The drivers were only protected during the first call, not during
subsequent ones. The addition of the BKL to usb_open() alone
duplicates this behavior. Adding BKL to individual devices in cases
like this is not required.
The tree is available for pulling from:
http://linux-bkl.bkbits.net/linux-2.5-bkl
--
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-01 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-01 10:22 [RFC] Push BKL into chrdev opens Dave Hansen
2002-08-01 18:02 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2002-08-02 18:20 ` Kevin O'Connor
2002-08-02 18:43 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D4977C3.7050806@us.ibm.com \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricklind@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox