public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Stephen Lord <lord@sgi.com>
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
	"Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>,
	Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Peter J. Braam" <braam@clusterfs.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BIG files & file systems
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 17:42:18 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D4E80BA.5040701@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1028552648.1251.26.camel@laptop.americas.sgi.com

Stephen Lord wrote:

>  
>
>>For a LinuxWorld presentation in August, I have asked each of the
>>4 journaling filesystems (ext3, reiserfs, JFS, and XFS) what their
>>filesystem/filesize limits are.  Here's what they have told me.
>>
>>                      ext3fs     reiserfs     JFS     XFS
>>max filesize:         16 TB#      1 EB       4 PB$   8 TB%
>>max filesystem size:   2 TB      17.6 TB*    4 PB$   2 TB!
>>
>>Notes:
>>#: think sparse files
>>*: 4 KB blocks
>>$: 16 TB on 32-bit architectures
>>%: 4 KB pages
>>!: block device limit
>>    
>>
>
>Randy,
>
>If those are the numbers you are presenting then make it clear that
>for XFS those are the limits imposed by the the Linux kernel. The
>core of XFS itself can support files and filesystems of 9 Exabytes.
>I do not think all the filesystems are reporting their numbers in
>the same way.
>
>Steve
>
>
>  
>
You might also mention that I think the limits imposed by Linux are the 
only meaningful ones, as we would change our limits as soon as Linux 
did, and it was Linux that selected our limits for us.  We would have 
changed already if Linux didn't make it pointless to change it on Intel. 
 Reiser4 will have 64 bit blocknumbers that will be semi-pointless until 
64 bit CPUs are widely deployed, and I am simply guessing this will be 
not very far into reiser4's lifecycle.  Really, the couple of #defines 
that constitute these size limits, plus some surrounding code, are not 
such a big thing to change (except that it constitutes a disk format 
change).

-- 
Hans




  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-05 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-31 19:16 BIG files & file systems Peter J. Braam
2002-07-31 19:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-07-31 20:04   ` Matti Aarnio
2002-07-31 20:12     ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-08-02 17:26     ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-08-02 22:14       ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-08-03  3:26         ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-08-06  5:19           ` Andreas Dilger
2002-08-06  7:24             ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-08-06  7:52               ` Andreas Dilger
2002-08-06  9:28             ` Matti Aarnio
2002-08-05 13:04         ` Stephen Lord
2002-08-05 13:42           ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2002-08-05 13:56             ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-08-05 14:21               ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-08-05 17:31                 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-08-06  0:16             ` jw schultz
2002-08-06  9:48               ` Hans Reiser
2002-07-31 21:07 ` Jan Harkes
2002-07-31 21:13   ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-01  3:51     ` Jan Harkes
2002-08-01 12:01       ` Mark Mielke
2002-08-02  0:09       ` Stephen Lord
2002-08-02 12:17         ` Chris Mason
2002-08-02 12:33           ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-08-02 13:56         ` Jan Harkes
2002-08-02 14:06           ` Steve Lord
2002-08-02 15:10             ` Hans Reiser
2002-08-02 15:39               ` Trond Myklebust
2002-08-02 17:01                 ` Hans Reiser
2002-08-02 17:25                   ` Nikita Danilov
2002-08-02 17:47                     ` Trond Myklebust
2002-08-02 18:10                       ` Nikita Danilov
2002-08-02 18:31                         ` Hans Reiser
2002-08-02 18:48                           ` Nikita Danilov
2002-08-02 18:59                             ` Hans Reiser
2002-08-01 12:01 ` David Woodhouse
2002-08-01 20:33 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D4E80BA.5040701@namesys.com \
    --to=reiser@namesys.com \
    --cc=acahalan@cs.uml.edu \
    --cc=braam@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lord@sgi.com \
    --cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
    --cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox