From: "David D. Hagood" <wowbagger@sktc.net>
To: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net
Cc: davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The spam problem.
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:18:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D572900.5090908@sktc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 027b24303030c82DTVMAIL11@smtp.cwctv.net
Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:
> YES THEY ARE SENT TO THE LIST, WOULD YOU LIKE COPIES? T hey are dangerous, they have gotten people KILLED.
I would suggest that anyone stupid enough to respond to a Nigerian spam
(or any spam, for that matter) sent to a mailing list like LKML
1) Shouldn't be reading LKML
2) Should make an appointment at the local family planning clinic.
3) If they have already reproduced, they should take their kids along.
I am as ardent an anti-spam warrior as the next guy, but let us not
waste bandwidth on LKML over this - forward the spams to Spamcop and
move on. The risk of blocking a legitimate email relative the (actually
quite small) number of spams the list receives is considered unwarrented
by the folks who run the list, and personally I agree with them - the
number of spams the list receives is pretty small, all things considered.
If you feel so strongly about it, rather than writing LKML, why not
write your (Congressdrones|MP...) and try to get some truely effective
antispam legislation passed (gak! saying that leaves a bad taste in my
basically libertarian mouth).
Once again, until we can hunt spammers like the vermin they are, this is
part of the unfortunate state of affairs - shouting about it won't help.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-12 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-12 3:04 RE:Re: The spam problem Hell.Surfers
2002-08-12 2:54 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-12 3:18 ` David D. Hagood [this message]
2002-08-13 3:19 ` Bill Davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-12 5:15 Jim Roland
2002-08-12 7:35 ` David Schwartz
2002-08-12 7:50 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-12 13:50 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-13 18:25 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-12 20:24 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-12 1:44 Hell.Surfers
2002-08-12 1:36 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-12 2:22 ` David D. Hagood
2002-08-12 2:12 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-12 2:48 ` David D. Hagood
2002-08-12 4:41 ` Jim Roland
2002-08-12 4:50 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-12 5:11 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-12 8:47 ` Willy Tarreau
[not found] ` <5.1.0.14.2.20020812064112.00b6b9c0@pop.gmx.net>
2002-08-12 4:48 ` Jim Roland
2002-08-12 5:00 ` Dhr N. Van Alphen
2002-08-12 8:42 ` Matti Aarnio
2002-08-12 5:12 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-12 11:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D572900.5090908@sktc.net \
--to=wowbagger@sktc.net \
--cc=Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox