From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:06:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:06:44 -0400 Received: from daimi.au.dk ([130.225.16.1]:23495 "EHLO daimi.au.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:06:43 -0400 Message-ID: <3D57B3AC.3BCF36F8@daimi.au.dk> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:10:04 +0200 From: Kasper Dupont Organization: daimi.au.dk X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-31smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Stephen Rothwell , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, julliard@winehq.com, ldb@ldb.ods.org Subject: Re: [patch] tls-2.5.31-C3 References: <20020812173404.39d3abab.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20020812182325.52324305.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1029146896.16216.113.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > For that > matter on Windows emulation I thought Windows also needed 0x40 to be the > same offset as the BIOS does so can't we leave it hardwired ? Does Wine and the BIOS actually want the same? I would believe there would have to be a small difference. Having Wine and BIOS using the same memory doesn't sound right to me. Wine wanting segment 0x40 to point to virtual address 0x400 and BIOS wanting segment 0x40 to point to physical address 0x400 sounds more reasonable to me. But physical address 0x400 would be virtual address 0xC0000400 with the default PAGE_OFFSET. -- Kasper Dupont -- der bruger for meget tid på usenet. For sending spam use mailto:aaarep@daimi.au.dk or mailto:mcxumhvenwblvtl@skrammel.yaboo.dk