From: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] PCI Cleanup
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:00:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D593B37.3070009@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1029250668.22847.34.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1292 bytes --]
Alan Cox wrote:
> I pointed out before the null check was flawed. And all I see is the
> same identical patch churned out again. Regardless of whether that
> paticular stupid error was in the old code, not fixing it in the new
> code when its pointed out is a bit of a mess.
The NULL check has been removed. The current version is attatched. It now
pulls out 75 lines of code. I must have missed your complaints about the null
check in previous emails... The check was done in the old pci_conf1 funcs, and
not in the pci_conf2 ones.. I thought this was strange as well, but I just
left them in...
> I'm not sure its a simplification either. More function pointers don't
> always make for neater - but thats a side issue. If the NULL check goes
> I'm not too worried about the other stuff.
I think that it is definitely a simplification, although I am a bit biased ;)
It makes it easier for other configuration types to hook into the system as
well (I'm partial to NUMA-Q as well ;). All they have to do is hijack the
pci_config_(read|write) function pointers.
Also, has anyone had a chance to look at it with pci_conf2? I have no
particular reason to believe it doesn't work, as the code paths are almost
identical, I'd just be nice to have a confirmation.
Cheers!
-Matt
[-- Attachment #2: pci_fix-2531.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6738 bytes --]
diff -Nur linux-2.5.31-vanilla/arch/i386/pci/direct.c linux-2.5.31-patched/arch/i386/pci/direct.c
--- linux-2.5.31-vanilla/arch/i386/pci/direct.c Sat Aug 10 18:41:23 2002
+++ linux-2.5.31-patched/arch/i386/pci/direct.c Tue Aug 13 09:45:12 2002
@@ -69,76 +69,7 @@
return 0;
}
-
#undef PCI_CONF1_ADDRESS
-
-static int pci_conf1_read_config_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 *value)
-{
- int result;
- u32 data;
-
- if (!value)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- result = pci_conf1_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
- PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 1, &data);
-
- *value = (u8)data;
-
- return result;
-}
-
-static int pci_conf1_read_config_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 *value)
-{
- int result;
- u32 data;
-
- if (!value)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- result = pci_conf1_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
- PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 2, &data);
-
- *value = (u16)data;
-
- return result;
-}
-
-static int pci_conf1_read_config_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 *value)
-{
- if (!value)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- return pci_conf1_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
- PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 4, value);
-}
-
-static int pci_conf1_write_config_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 value)
-{
- return pci_conf1_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
- PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 1, value);
-}
-
-static int pci_conf1_write_config_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 value)
-{
- return pci_conf1_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
- PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 2, value);
-}
-
-static int pci_conf1_write_config_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 value)
-{
- return pci_conf1_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
- PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 4, value);
-}
-
-static struct pci_ops pci_direct_conf1 = {
- pci_conf1_read_config_byte,
- pci_conf1_read_config_word,
- pci_conf1_read_config_dword,
- pci_conf1_write_config_byte,
- pci_conf1_write_config_word,
- pci_conf1_write_config_dword
-};
/*
@@ -217,57 +149,58 @@
#undef PCI_CONF2_ADDRESS
-static int pci_conf2_read_config_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 *value)
+
+static int pci_config_read_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 *value)
{
int result;
u32 data;
- result = pci_conf2_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
+ result = pci_config_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 1, &data);
*value = (u8)data;
return result;
}
-static int pci_conf2_read_config_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 *value)
+static int pci_config_read_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 *value)
{
int result;
u32 data;
- result = pci_conf2_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
+ result = pci_config_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 2, &data);
*value = (u16)data;
return result;
}
-static int pci_conf2_read_config_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 *value)
+static int pci_config_read_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 *value)
{
- return pci_conf2_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
+ return pci_config_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 4, value);
}
-static int pci_conf2_write_config_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 value)
+static int pci_config_write_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 value)
{
- return pci_conf2_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
+ return pci_config_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 1, value);
}
-static int pci_conf2_write_config_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 value)
+static int pci_config_write_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 value)
{
- return pci_conf2_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
+ return pci_config_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 2, value);
}
-static int pci_conf2_write_config_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 value)
+static int pci_config_write_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 value)
{
- return pci_conf2_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
+ return pci_config_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 4, value);
}
-static struct pci_ops pci_direct_conf2 = {
- pci_conf2_read_config_byte,
- pci_conf2_read_config_word,
- pci_conf2_read_config_dword,
- pci_conf2_write_config_byte,
- pci_conf2_write_config_word,
- pci_conf2_write_config_dword
+static struct pci_ops pci_direct = {
+ pci_config_read_byte,
+ pci_config_read_word,
+ pci_config_read_dword,
+ pci_config_write_byte,
+ pci_config_write_word,
+ pci_config_write_dword
};
@@ -301,7 +235,7 @@
return 0;
}
-static struct pci_ops * __devinit pci_check_direct(void)
+static int __init pci_direct_init(void)
{
unsigned int tmp;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -312,17 +246,21 @@
* Check if configuration type 1 works.
*/
if (pci_probe & PCI_PROBE_CONF1) {
+ pci_config_read = pci_conf1_read;
+ pci_config_write = pci_conf1_write;
outb (0x01, 0xCFB);
tmp = inl (0xCF8);
outl (0x80000000, 0xCF8);
if (inl (0xCF8) == 0x80000000 &&
- pci_sanity_check(&pci_direct_conf1)) {
+ pci_sanity_check(&pci_direct)) {
outl (tmp, 0xCF8);
local_irq_restore(flags);
printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using configuration type 1\n");
if (!request_region(0xCF8, 8, "PCI conf1"))
- return NULL;
- return &pci_direct_conf1;
+ pci_root_ops = NULL;
+ else
+ pci_root_ops = &pci_direct;
+ return 0;
}
outl (tmp, 0xCF8);
}
@@ -331,36 +269,25 @@
* Check if configuration type 2 works.
*/
if (pci_probe & PCI_PROBE_CONF2) {
+ pci_config_read = pci_conf2_read;
+ pci_config_write = pci_conf2_write;
outb (0x00, 0xCFB);
outb (0x00, 0xCF8);
outb (0x00, 0xCFA);
if (inb (0xCF8) == 0x00 && inb (0xCFA) == 0x00 &&
- pci_sanity_check(&pci_direct_conf2)) {
+ pci_sanity_check(&pci_direct)) {
local_irq_restore(flags);
printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using configuration type 2\n");
if (!request_region(0xCF8, 4, "PCI conf2"))
- return NULL;
- return &pci_direct_conf2;
+ pci_root_ops = NULL;
+ else
+ pci_root_ops = &pci_direct;
+ return 0;
}
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
- return NULL;
-}
-
-static int __init pci_direct_init(void)
-{
- if ((pci_probe & (PCI_PROBE_CONF1 | PCI_PROBE_CONF2))
- && (pci_root_ops = pci_check_direct())) {
- if (pci_root_ops == &pci_direct_conf1) {
- pci_config_read = pci_conf1_read;
- pci_config_write = pci_conf1_write;
- }
- else {
- pci_config_read = pci_conf2_read;
- pci_config_write = pci_conf2_write;
- }
- }
+ pci_root_ops = NULL;
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-13 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-13 0:08 [patch] PCI Cleanup Matthew Dobson
2002-08-13 11:45 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 14:17 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 14:57 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 15:15 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 17:00 ` Matthew Dobson [this message]
2002-08-13 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 19:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 20:13 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 22:29 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-08-13 22:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-14 0:57 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-08-15 0:23 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-08-14 7:08 ` Martin Mares
2002-08-13 14:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 15:07 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-15 2:24 Grover, Andrew
2002-08-15 7:49 ` Martin Mares
2002-08-15 15:58 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-08-15 16:36 ` Greg KH
2002-08-16 22:34 ` Greg KH
2002-08-19 23:41 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-08-15 18:28 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-08-15 20:23 Grover, Andrew
2002-08-15 20:54 ` Patrick Mochel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D593B37.3070009@us.ibm.com \
--to=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox