From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Joe Thornber <joe@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] simplify b_inode usage
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:10:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D5975B2.66B4B215@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020813171024.A4365@lst.de
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Current the b_inode of struct buffer_head is a pointer to an inode, but
> it only always used as bool value. This patch changes it to an simple
> int (yes, I know some people have ideas for a flag that uses less space,
> but that can be easily done ontop of this cleanup). The advantage is
> that we don't have to pass in the inode into buffer_insert_inode_queue/
> buffer_insert_inode_data_queue and can merge them into a more general
> buffer_insert_list, with inline wrappers around it. reiserfs can now
> use buffer_insert_list directly and embedd a simple list_head instead
> of a full static inode into it's journal.
>
> A similar cleanup has already been done in early 2.5, but the b_inode
> flag is completly gone there now.
>
Current ext3 CVS (ie: 2.4.20 candidate code) is using b_inode
as an inode *. Stephen has acked a proposal to stop doing that,
but let's double check with him first.
Also, Joe Thornber needs to add another pointer to struct buffer_head
for LVM2 reasons. If we collapse b_inode into a b_flags bit then
Joe gets his pointer for free (bh stays at 48 bytes on ia32).
So I'd suggest you just go ahead and do it that way. (I had a patch
for that but seem to have misplaced it).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-13 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-13 15:10 [PATCH] simplify b_inode usage Christoph Hellwig
2002-08-13 21:10 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-08-14 7:43 ` Joe Thornber
2002-08-16 12:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-08-16 14:22 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D5975B2.66B4B215@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=joe@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox