Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Include LRU in page count

Rik van Riel
2002-09-02T01:04:47Z

On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> Are we looking at the same thing? The cpu load there is dominated by
> cpu_idle, 89%. Anyway, if your point is that it makes sense to run
> shrink_cache or refill_inactive in parallel, I don't see it because
> they'll serialize on the lru lock anyway. What would make sense is to
> make shink_cache nonblocking.

Working on it ;)

Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/