From: Steve Kenton <skenton@ou.edu>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, skenton@ou.edu
Subject: [PATCH] redundant stddef.h in wait.h
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 22:22:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D757C84.C8B26470@ou.edu> (raw)
In 2.5.32, include/linux/wait.h includes both kernel.h and stddef.h, but
kernel.h already includes stddef.h. So, should we just delete the
redundant include of stddef.h? There are others. If this is OK, I will
sent it and it's kin to trivial.
Patch below for perusal and comments
Steve Kenton
--- include/linux/wait.h.orig Tue Sep 3 21:35:51 2002
+++ include/linux/wait.h Tue Sep 3 21:36:00 2002
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
-#include <linux/stddef.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/config.h>
reply other threads:[~2002-09-04 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D757C84.C8B26470@ou.edu \
--to=skenton@ou.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox