Re: One more bio for for floppy users in 2.5.33..

[Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> ...
> A fast disk driver will _never ever_ do a partial request completion. A
> high-performance subsystem will put in the scatter-gather list and say
> "go" to the controller, and the controller will send exactly one interrupt
> back when it is all done.

OK.  But still, I don't see why we need partial BIO completions.  If
we say that the basic unit of completion is a whole BIO, then readahead
can then manage latency via the outgoing bio size.
 
> So for such a system, you'd never see partial completions anyway.
> 
> Partial completions are a feature of slow hardware. And slow hardware is
> exactly when we want to know about it.

Well I'd be interested in knowing specifically what is wrong with the
behaviour of 2.5.33 against a floppy disk.

In the testing I did a few weeks back, everything checked out.  An
application which was reading the raw device at 95% of media bandwidth
never blocked.  An application which was capable of processing data at
120% of media bandwidth achieved 100%.

It could be that the initial 64k read at the start-of-file is
too big, and the many-small-file behaviour is poor?

A specific "this sucks" testcase would be helpful...