From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: "Hanumanthu. H" <hanumanthu.hanok@wipro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pid_max hang again...
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 11:06:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D79C195.90004@colorfullife.com> (raw)
> As Manfred pointed out, pid allocation and inserting it into task
> list should be atomic. But going by the range of pids available
> in 2.5.33 (Linux made it 30-bits), it is unlikely that same pid
> will be given to two processes, since last_pid is protected by
> single lock.
Right now there is quite a lot of code between get_pid and the insertion
into the task list: copy mm, files, etc.
And just before the endless loop in get_pid(), there is only one pid
left --> probability of getting the same pid again is high. If you fix
the hang, you should fix the atomicity, too.
> If last_pid is within PID_MAX and max_pid_cross is set, this
> pid might have been given to another process. So, goto the
> corresponding hashlist and check for its existence. If no task
> with given pid found, then get_pid is free to return pid as the
> available pid.
Doesn't work: find_task_by_pid() only checks task->pid. But the result
of get_pid mustn't be in use as a session or tgid value either
--
Manfred
next reply other threads:[~2002-09-07 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-07 9:06 Manfred Spraul [this message]
2002-09-09 14:22 ` [PATCH] pid_max hang again Hanumanthu. H
2002-09-09 15:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-09 22:39 ` jw schultz
2002-09-10 9:54 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-10 19:29 ` jw schultz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-11 8:59 Hanumanthu. H
2002-09-11 17:19 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-11 20:23 ` jw schultz
2002-09-12 1:11 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-12 1:54 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-12 20:23 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-12 21:17 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-12 21:21 ` yodaiken
2002-09-13 5:47 ` Hanumanthu. H
2002-09-07 8:16 Hanumanthu. H
2002-09-06 21:06 Manfred Spraul
2002-09-06 15:39 Ingo Molnar
2002-09-06 17:43 ` [PATCH] " Paul Larson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D79C195.90004@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=hanumanthu.hanok@wipro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox