Re: [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36

Con Kolivas
2002-09-19T08:09:18Z

Quoting Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>:

> On Wednesday 18 September 2002 18:50, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > > No Load:
> > > > Kernel Time CPU
> > > > 2.4.19 68.14 99%
> > > > 2.4.20-pre7 68.11 99%
> > > > 2.5.34 69.88 99%
> > > > 2.4.19-ck7 68.40 98%
> > > > 2.4.19-ck7-rmap 68.73 99%
> > > > 2.4.19-cc 68.37 99%
> > > > 2.5.36 69.58 99%
> > >
> > > page_add/remove_rmap. Be interesting to test an Alan kernel too.
> >
> > Yes, but why are page_add/remove_rmap slower in 2.5 than in
> > Con's -rmap kernel ? ;)
>
> I don't know what you guys are going on about, these differences are
> getting close to statistically insignificant.

These ones definitely are insignificant. I've found the limit with repeat
measurements about +/- 1%

Con.