Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice driver

Adrian Bunk
2002-09-30T11:12:13Z

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Tomas Szepe wrote:

> > Technically correct. Major version jump should be made when there is
> > a binary incompatibility. It can be made without, but it is usually
> > done for marketing reasons. I hope we'll never have marketing reasons
> > for lk. :-) We can be actually _proud_ to have 2.$BIGNUM instead of
> > 3.0
>
> ... and go Solaris, as in 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 7, 8, 9. :D

NetBSD still has sane version numbers: :-)

0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6

> T.

cu
Adrian

--

You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of
time explaining its a free country because its a police state.
Alan Cox