From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 07:25:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 07:25:02 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:47370 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 07:25:02 -0400 Message-ID: <3D904CC2.4080607@namesys.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:30:10 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oleg Drokin CC: Jakob Oestergaard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ReiserFS buglet References: <20020924072455.GE2442@unthought.net> <20020924132110.A22362@namesys.com> <20020924092720.GF2442@unthought.net> <20020924134816.A23185@namesys.com> <20020924100338.GH2442@unthought.net> <20020924142521.C23185@namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oleg Drokin wrote: >Hello! > >On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:03:38PM +0200, Jakob Oestergaard wrote: > > > >>It's a question of which errors one wishes to handle, and which you >>simply choose to ignore. >> >> > >Yes, that's true. Reiserfs chose to not handle any HW errors, this is even >written somewhere in our FAQ. > No, this is not true. We handle IO errors. We do not attempt to handle every imaginable hardware error because no one can. If your CPU overheats, our code makes no effort to compensate for it. Hans