From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: G@thunk.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 23:44:57 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D9C9E39.6090804@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021003194049.GA16329@think.thunk.org
Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:04:12PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>>No they don't. Average space wastage is more than 50% because sysadmins
>>have to be conservative.
>>
>>
>
>Sure, but even a hundred megabytes or two out of a 100 gigabyte drive
>is cheap. (Specifically, about fifty cents' worth.)
>
> - Ted
>
>
>
>
Usual space wastage is on the order of 5% of total partition size, yes?
Allocating 0.1% of your drive for inodes will get you into trouble if a
user does something like use mh or read news, etc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-03 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-01 19:59 [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1 Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-10-01 20:43 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-01 20:49 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-01 21:17 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-01 21:31 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 20:43 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-01 21:19 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-02 10:48 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-10-02 16:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-03 0:37 ` [Ext2-devel] " Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-03 12:04 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-03 19:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-03 19:44 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2002-10-04 15:53 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-10-04 17:09 ` [Ext2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2002-10-07 6:54 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-10-10 0:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 21:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-02 16:38 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-10-02 6:39 ` Nikita Danilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D9C9E39.6090804@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=G@thunk.org \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox