From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@cox.net>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2?
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:03:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D9E020E.9070703@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021004204851.26027.qmail@web40020.mail.yahoo.com
Brad Chapman wrote:
> I'm going to be installing RH8 soon, and would like to know if gcc 3.2
> miscompiles 2.4 kernel code (i.e. 2.4.20-pre8, for example). Are there any
> problems with the code that gcc 3.2 produces from kernel source?
>
> Brad
>
I have a system that's been running 2.4.20-preX compiled with GCC 3.2
for over a month now, no problems so far.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-04 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-04 20:48 Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2? Brad Chapman
2002-10-04 21:03 ` Kevin P. Fleming [this message]
2002-10-05 0:37 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D9E020E.9070703@cox.net \
--to=kpfleming@cox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox