Re: New BK License Problem?

[FD Cami <stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

jbradford@dial.pipex.com wrote:
|>You can argue all you like that I'm wrong, I'm misguided, I don't have
|>a clue about opensource or whatever.  The problem is that if I did what
|>you'd like to see, GPL the code, and it turns out I was right, there is no
|>turning back.  That's a gamble I'm unwilling to make because I am positive
|>of the outcome.  And given what I've been doing for the last 5 years,
|>my knowledge is probably more complete than your for this particular
|>space.  I know it isn't a popular position to take, I'd love to be the
|>guy everyone loved instead of hated, but I'm not going to screw up BK's
|>future and our ability to support our users to win a popularity contest.
|
|
| Roughly how much would you want to raise, in order to GPL Bit Keeper?
  Seriously, this was done with Blender...
|
| John.

Blender's parent company, NotANumber, went bankrupt.
That's not the case of bitmover I think...
And I think Larry wants to keep his own business, he has the right to do
so...


- --

F. CAMI
- ----------------------------------------------------------
~ "To disable the Internet to save EMI and Disney is the
moral equivalent of burning down the library of Alexandria
to ensure the livelihood of monastic scribes."
~              - John Ippolito (Guggenheim)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9oIdPuBGY13rZQM8RAggpAJ9D50jP8mJcU5MByXDraZzXgscw6QCggxDW
IoCRUPTOKU5/lMtIhj5IuWk=
=XCXU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----