From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261761AbSJIOXE>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:23:04 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261762AbSJIOXE>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:23:04 -0400
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:54276 "EHLO
	www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S261761AbSJIOXD>;
	Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:23:03 -0400
Message-ID: <3DA43D05.6060707@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:28:21 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: brendan.simon@bigpond.com
CC: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
       linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       kbuild-devel <kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: linux kernel conf 0.8
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210091546070.8911-100000@serv> <3DA439B2.3000801@bigpond.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Brendan J Simon wrote:
> Simple and boring but how about "Config2.in" or "Config-2.in" ???

no offense intended, but:

	ug...