From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:31:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:31:39 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:34312 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:30:26 -0400 Message-ID: <3DA47709.30606@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 14:35:53 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Sam Ravnborg , Roman Zippel , linux-kernel , kbuild-devel Subject: Re: linux kernel conf 0.8 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > So instead: how about just "Config" for the main per-directory > configuration file, with sub-config's being "Config.3c5xx" and > "Config.rrunner". I like it. I'm glad Sam mentioned sub-configs such as Config.3c5xx, that's something that was discussed a while ago [and apparently we all forgot about it subsequently :)] And the above eliminates my criticism of having "Config.in" be two different config languages, depending on your kernel version. Jeff