From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kbuild-devel <kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: linux kernel conf 0.8
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:18:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA58C1E.3090102@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.44.0210100035210.338-100000@serv
Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>
>>Which implies that the equivalent of "source drivers/net/Config*"
>>(wildcarding) in Roman's system would be useful. Or maybe "source
>>drivers/net" and it knows that when given a directory it should scan for
>>all Config* files in that dir.
>
>
> This makes dependency checking problematic, as we constantly have to
> check for new config files. How would I teach make/kbuild this?
I won't answer the question, but instead pose a future problem: if
drivers are to be added without patching anything, that implies that the
kbuild makefile rules for the driver are also added without patching.
Personally I don't care about Config dependency checking... they are
not modified often enough to affect me, and even if they did, dependency
checking based on changes to Config files can get ugly, AFAICS. I just
do a "bk -r co -Sq" and am done with it...
I didn't say life was easy ;-) ;-)
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-10 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210081830350.4396-100000@home.transmeta.com>
2002-10-09 12:01 ` linux kernel conf 0.8 Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 13:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-09 13:55 ` Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 14:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-09 14:14 ` [kbuild-devel] " Brendan J Simon
2002-10-09 14:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-09 14:24 ` Brendan J Simon
2002-10-09 14:34 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-09 14:45 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-10-09 15:14 ` Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 15:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-09 15:19 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-09 16:29 ` Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 16:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-09 18:39 ` Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 18:52 ` Peter Samuelson
2002-10-09 19:28 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-09 19:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-09 19:47 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-09 14:55 ` [kbuild-devel] " Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 17:16 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-09 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-09 17:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-09 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-09 19:26 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-09 20:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-09 22:49 ` Roman Zippel
2002-10-10 14:18 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2002-10-10 17:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-10 17:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-10 17:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-09 23:49 ` [kbuild-devel] " Brendan J Simon
2002-10-09 18:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-09 0:40 Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DA58C1E.3090102@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox