public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch] 2.5.41: mii breakage in xircom_tulip_cb
@ 2002-10-07 22:07 Stig Brautaset
  2002-10-08 12:04 ` Felipe W Damasio
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stig Brautaset @ 2002-10-07 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

I use the xircom_tulip_cb driver with 2.4.19, because it is mii-enabled,
and the new driver isn't. 

In 2.5.41 (and .40, at least) the mii-capabilities is not there, I have
not tested earlier development kernels. The changes between the driver
in 2.4.19 and 2.5.41 are miniscule, so I was able to make mii work
again (this is my first attempt at kernel hacking; don't laugh :). It's
most definately _not_ the correct fix, it is just a revert from 2.4.19
that makes mii work for me again in 2.5.


--- drivers/net/tulip/xircom_tulip_cb.c.orig	Mon Oct  7 22:53:22 2002
+++ drivers/net/tulip/xircom_tulip_cb.c	Mon Oct  7 22:31:45 2002
@@ -1469,18 +1469,21 @@
 
 	/* Legacy mii-diag interface */
 	case SIOCGMIIPHY:		/* Get address of MII PHY in use. */
+	case SIOCDEVPRIVATE:		/* for binary compat, remove in 2.5 */
 		if (tp->mii_cnt)
 			data[0] = phy;
 		else
 			return -ENODEV;
 		return 0;
 	case SIOCGMIIREG:		/* Read MII PHY register. */
+	case SIOCDEVPRIVATE+1:		/* for binary compat, remove in 2.5 */
 		save_flags(flags);
 		cli();
 		data[3] = mdio_read(dev, data[0] & 0x1f, data[1] & 0x1f);
 		restore_flags(flags);
 		return 0;
 	case SIOCSMIIREG:		/* Write MII PHY register. */
+	case SIOCDEVPRIVATE+2:		/* for binary compat, remove in 2.5 */
 		if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
 			return -EPERM;
 		save_flags(flags);


Stig
-- 
brautaset.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] 2.5.41: mii breakage in xircom_tulip_cb
  2002-10-07 22:07 [patch] 2.5.41: mii breakage in xircom_tulip_cb Stig Brautaset
@ 2002-10-08 12:04 ` Felipe W Damasio
  2002-10-10 18:42   ` Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Felipe W Damasio @ 2002-10-08 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stig Brautaset, linux-kernel, jgarzik


----- Original Message -----
From: "Stig Brautaset" <stig@brautaset.org>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:07 PM
Subject: [patch] 2.5.41: mii breakage in xircom_tulip_cb


> In 2.5.41 (and .40, at least) the mii-capabilities is not there, I have
> not tested earlier development kernels. The changes between the driver
> in 2.4.19 and 2.5.41 are miniscule, so I was able to make mii work
> again (this is my first attempt at kernel hacking; don't laugh :). It's
> most definately _not_ the correct fix, it is just a revert from 2.4.19
> that makes mii work for me again in 2.5.

   Isn't this (or shouldn't this) be supported by the 2.4 version of the
"generic_mii_ioctl"? Jeff?

   Since this is a rather new function (in since 2.5.40) the fix is valid,
though the net drivers should use this function (I'll look into this).

Felipe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] 2.5.41: mii breakage in xircom_tulip_cb
  2002-10-08 12:04 ` Felipe W Damasio
@ 2002-10-10 18:42   ` Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2002-10-10 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Felipe W Damasio; +Cc: Stig Brautaset, linux-kernel, jgarzik

Felipe W Damasio wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stig Brautaset" <stig@brautaset.org>
> To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:07 PM
> Subject: [patch] 2.5.41: mii breakage in xircom_tulip_cb
> 
> 
> 
>>In 2.5.41 (and .40, at least) the mii-capabilities is not there, I have
>>not tested earlier development kernels. The changes between the driver
>>in 2.4.19 and 2.5.41 are miniscule, so I was able to make mii work
>>again (this is my first attempt at kernel hacking; don't laugh :). It's
>>most definately _not_ the correct fix, it is just a revert from 2.4.19
>>that makes mii work for me again in 2.5.
> 
> 
>    Isn't this (or shouldn't this) be supported by the 2.4 version of the
> "generic_mii_ioctl"? Jeff?

Yes, current 2.4.x and 2.5.x trees both have generic_mii_ioctl...

	Jeff




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-10 18:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-07 22:07 [patch] 2.5.41: mii breakage in xircom_tulip_cb Stig Brautaset
2002-10-08 12:04 ` Felipe W Damasio
2002-10-10 18:42   ` Jeff Garzik

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox