Re: Linux v2.5.42

Alan Cox
2002-10-12T11:29:02Z

On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 12:11, jw schultz wrote:
> So far everything indicates that LVM2 is not compatible with
> LVM. That LVM2 and LVM(1) can coexist-exist is irrelevant if
> 2.5 hasn't got a working LVM(1). And that would leave us
> with having to do backup+restore around the upgrade.

LVM2 supports LVM1 volumes. I don't know where you got the idea
otherwise.