Re: Linux v2.5.42

Alan Cox
2002-10-12T19:16:47Z

On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 18:14, Mark Peloquin wrote:
> Should EVMS be included, the team will make it our top priority to resolve
> the disputed design issues. If the ruling should be that some of our design
> decisions must change, so be it, we will comply. Certainly some changes can
> not be done by the 20th or 31st, however I feel the team can handle most
> changes before 2.6 ships.

Thats good to hear. Right now the debate appears to be - "users: please
add EVMS" "hackers: oh my god no" - so you got the feature set right it
seems