From: Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com>
To: GrandMasterLee <masterlee@digitalroadkill.net>
Cc: J Sloan <joe@tmsusa.com>, Simon Roscic <simon.roscic@chello.at>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel 2.5] Qlogic 2x00 driver
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:59:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DAD0E36.9040809@metaparadigm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1034750930.2045.35.camel@localhost
On 10/16/02 14:48, GrandMasterLee wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 01:40, Michael Clark wrote:
> ...
>
>>>Should I remove LVM all together, or just not use it? In your opinion.
>>
>>I just didn't load the module after migrating my volumes. If the problem
>>is a stack problem, then its probably not necessarily a bug in LVM
>>- just the combination of it, ext3 and the qlogic driver don't mix well
>>- so if its not being used, then it won't be increasing the stack footprint.
>
> Not to be dense, but it's compiled into my kernel, that's why I ask. We
> try not to use modules where we can help it. So I'm thinking, if no VG
> are actively used, then LVM won't affect the stack much. I just don't
> know if that's true or not.
Correct. Won't effect the stack at all.
~mc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-16 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-15 19:20 [Kernel 2.5] Qlogic 2x00 driver Simon Roscic
2002-10-15 19:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-15 19:53 ` Simon Roscic
2002-10-16 2:51 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 3:56 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 4:30 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 4:35 ` J Sloan
2002-10-16 4:43 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 6:03 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 6:31 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 6:40 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 6:48 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 6:59 ` Michael Clark [this message]
2002-10-16 4:58 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 5:28 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 5:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-17 1:59 ` Andrew Vasquez
2002-10-17 2:44 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-17 3:11 ` Andrew Vasquez
2002-10-17 3:42 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-17 9:40 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-18 6:45 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 16:28 ` Simon Roscic
2002-10-16 16:49 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-17 3:12 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-17 3:54 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-17 4:08 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-17 5:03 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 5:02 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 16:38 ` Simon Roscic
2002-10-17 3:08 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-17 17:47 ` Simon Roscic
2002-10-18 6:42 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-18 15:11 ` Simon Roscic
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-19 2:17 rwhron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DAD0E36.9040809@metaparadigm.com \
--to=michael@metaparadigm.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@tmsusa.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masterlee@digitalroadkill.net \
--cc=simon.roscic@chello.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox