From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 02:03:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 02:03:38 -0400 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:43928 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 02:03:37 -0400 Message-ID: <3DAE5415.938EA547@digeo.com> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:09:25 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.42 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Ledford CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: balance_dirty_pages broken References: <20021017043623.GR8159@redhat.com> <3DAE4615.F98B6DE@digeo.com> <20021017052246.GB10276@redhat.com> <20021017054110.GC10276@redhat.com> <3DAE5087.76395305@digeo.com> <20021017060123.GD10276@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2002 06:09:25.0823 (UTC) FILETIME=[BEA26CF0:01C275A3] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Doug Ledford wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:54:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Doug Ledford wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:22:46AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > > Sure, coming under separate cover. > > > > > > Actually, this isn't needed now I assume ;-) > > > > Well I was rather interested in seeing it to find out why your > > compile is busted. You seem to be very protective of the compiler > > error messages ;) > > OK. .config attached, error message inline: > > gcc -Wp,-MD,arch/i386/kernel/.mpparse.o.d -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer > -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 > -march=i686 -Iarch/i386/mach-generic -nostdinc -iwithprefix include > -DKBUILD_BASENAME=mpparse -c -o arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.o > arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c > arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c: In function `MP_processor_info': > arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.c:130: warning: implicit declaration of function > `Dprintk' but, but, but. The patch I sent should have fixed that. It makes Dprintk visible in apic.h regardless of the setting of CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC > ... > > Should I run another test of just this patch to be sure? She'll be right, mate.