Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security

Greg KH
2002-10-17T20:22:24Z

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:20:21PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> With the current LSM setup of a 2^32 LSM calls, you can
> choose a number somewhat arbitarily and be fairly sure that it won't conflict
> and that you can later register the same number with the LSM people.

You do not have to "register" a syscall number with the LSM people. We
don't care. Use whatever you want for your sys_security call. If you
want to be nice, read the documentation and use a module id that is
unique.

Personally I hate the "module id" idea, but that's just me...

thanks,

greg k-h