From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:36:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:36:39 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:28429 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:36:38 -0400 Message-ID: <3DB555D5.7090904@namesys.com> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:42:45 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2a) Gecko/20020910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Blackwell CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry McVoy Subject: Re: Listmaster request: Do not blacklist rms@gnu.org References: <20021021182737.A23371@infradead.org> <20021022014015.GB23958@Master.Wizards> <3DB4AEC1.1060906@pobox.com> <3DB4B455.921467D3@digeo.com> <20021021193131.G20688@work.bitmover.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org James Blackwell wrote: >Do you think Hans Reiser >felt like you were doing the right thing when he had to change his >timeline on Reiserfs so as to avoid competing with your project as long >as possible? > > > I did not change my timeline. Though I was tempted to move version control up in the priority queue, it nonetheless will remain low until the right developer comes along, or other things that also need doing are moved out of that queue. Hans