linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: cmm@us.ibm.com
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	manfred@colorfullife.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dipankar@in.ibm.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:29:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB87458.F5C7DABA@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3DB86B05.447E7410@us.ibm.com

mingming cao wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Here is the updated ipc lock patch:

Well I can get you a bit of testing and attention, but I'm afraid
my knowledge of the IPC code is negligible.

So to be able to commend this change to Linus I'd have to rely on
assurances from people who _do_ understand IPC (Hugh?) and on lots
of testing.

So yes, I'll include it, and would solicit success reports from
people who are actually exercising that code path, thanks.

> http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt1prfrns/results/mingming/index.html

DBT1 is really interesting, and I'm glad the OSDL team have
put it together.  If people would only stop sending me patches
I'd be using it ;)

Could someone please help explain the results?  Comparing, say,
http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt1prfrns/results/mingming/run.2cpu.42-mm2.r5/index.html
and
http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt1prfrns/results/mingming/run.18.r5/index.html

It would appear that 2.5 completely smoked 2.4 on response time,
yet the overall bogotransactions/sec is significantly lower.
What should we conclude from this?

Also I see:

	14.7 minute duration
and
	Time for DBT run 19:36

What is the 14.7 minutes referring to?

Also:

	2.5: Time for key creation 1:27
	2.4: Time for key creation 14:24
versus:
	2.5: Time for table creation 16:48
	2.4: Time for table creation 8:58

So it's all rather confusing.  Masses of numbers usually _are_
confusing.  What really adds tons of value to such an exercise is
for the person who ran the test to write up some conclusions.  To
tell the developers what went well, what went poorly, what areas
to focus on, etc.  To use your own judgement to tell us what to
zoom in on.

Is that something which could be added?

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-24 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-18  0:14 [PATCH]IPC locks breaking down with RCU mingming cao
2002-10-20 13:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-20 17:27   ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-21 18:11     ` mingming cao
2002-10-21 19:00       ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-24 21:49         ` [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch mingming cao
2002-10-24 22:29           ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-10-24 22:56             ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-24 23:30               ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 23:59                 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-25  0:35                   ` [Lse-tech] " Rick Lindsley
2002-10-25  1:07                     ` Robert Love
2002-10-25  0:07                 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25  0:24                   ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-25  4:18                 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-25  5:53                   ` mingming cao
2002-10-25  7:27                     ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-25  5:36                 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-10-25 16:53                 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-24 23:23             ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 14:21               ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Larson
2002-10-25 17:17                 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 18:20                   ` Paul Larson
2002-10-25 18:51                     ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 19:06                       ` Paul Larson
2002-10-25 20:14                         ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 20:23                       ` Manfred Spraul
2002-10-25  0:38             ` Cliff White
2002-10-31 17:52             ` [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch [PERFORMANCE RESULTS] Bill Hartner
2002-10-21 19:18       ` [PATCH]IPC locks breaking down with RCU Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-21 19:36         ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-21 19:41         ` mingming cao
2002-10-21 20:14           ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-21 18:07   ` mingming cao
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-25 17:20 [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch Cliff White
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210270748560.1704-100000@localhost.localdomain>
2002-10-28  1:06 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-28 14:21   ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-28 21:47     ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-29  0:26       ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-29  2:51         ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-28 20:00   ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-28 21:41     ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-29  6:11       ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-28 22:07     ` mingming cao
2002-10-29  1:06       ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-28  1:15 Rusty Russell
2002-10-28  1:35 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28  4:10   ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-28 17:08     ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 22:39       ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-28 23:52         ` Davide Libenzi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DB87458.F5C7DABA@digeo.com \
    --to=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).