Re: poll-related "scheduling while atomic", 2.5.44-mm6

Matt Reppert
2002-10-29T23:49:09Z

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:19:04 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> wrote:

> Matt Reppert wrote:
> >
> > So my guess is somewhere between -mm5 and -mm6 we
> > screwed up the atomicity count.
>
> Mine too. I'll check it out, thanks.
>
> Do you have preemption enabled?

Sure do.

Thanks,
Matt