From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 03:37:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 03:37:24 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:13585 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 03:37:23 -0500 Message-ID: <3DBF9BA5.6000100@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 03:43:17 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Reiser CC: torvalds@transmeta.com, Nikita Danilov , landley@trommello.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5 merge candidate list, final version. (End of "crunch time" series.) References: <200210280534.16821.landley@trommello.org> <15805.27643.403378.829985@laputa.namesys.com> <3DBF9600.4060208@namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hans Reiser wrote: > We are going to submit a patch appropriate for inclusion as an > experimental FS on Halloween. I hope you will forgive our pushing > the limit timewise, it is not by choice, but the algorithms we used to > more than double reiserfs V3 performance were, quite frankly, hard to > code. Does your merge change the core code at all? Does it add new syscalls?