public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@bergmann-dalldorf.de>
Cc: kernel-janitor-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: might_sleep() in copy_{from,to}_user and friends?
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 02:51:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DC25CA5.B15848E0@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200211011302.05461.arnd@bergmann-dalldorf.de

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> I have been looking for more places in 2.5 that can be marked
> might_sleep() and noticed that all the functions in asm/uaccess.h
> are not marked although they sleep if the memory they access
> has to be paged in.
> 
> After adding might_sleep() in ten places in asm-i386/uaccess.h
> and arch/i386/lib/usercopy.c, I have been running this kernel
> for about two weeks.

This is an excellent point.  If someone is holding a lock
across a uaccess function and userspace has passed the address
of a valid but not-present page we will hit the "atomic copy_user"
path.  Userspace will be returned an EFAULT and will be left
scratching its head, wondering what it did wrong.

Or the kernel will deadlock, of course.

I don't think we need to add the check to anything other than
ia32.  That will pick up the great bulk of any problems, and
arch-specific code won't be doing these copies much anyway.

So if you could prepare a patch which adds these checks for
ia32 it would be muchly appreciated.

And if you're feeling really keen, Dave Jones has a patch which
makes the might_sleep check a real config option rather than
overloading CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL - would be nice to squeeze that
out of him if poss.

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-01 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-01 12:02 might_sleep() in copy_{from,to}_user and friends? Arnd Bergmann
2002-11-01 10:10 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2002-11-01 10:51 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-11-01 14:13   ` Dave Jones
2002-11-01 14:42   ` Arnd Bergmann
2002-11-01 22:34   ` Randy.Dunlap
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-01 13:47 Manfred Spraul
2002-11-01 16:49 ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DC25CA5.B15848E0@digeo.com \
    --to=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=arnd@bergmann-dalldorf.de \
    --cc=kernel-janitor-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox