The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Lev Makhlis <mlev@despammed.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ricklind@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.46: overflow in disk stats
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 22:06:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DC8B16E.EAFC854@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200211060009.51684.mlev@despammed.com

Lev Makhlis wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I see that the SARD changes have been merged, but MSEC() still has
> the overflow problem.  This takes care of it:
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> diff -urN linux-2.5.46.orig/drivers/block/genhd.c
> linux-2.5.46/drivers/block/genhd.c
> --- linux-2.5.46.orig/drivers/block/genhd.c     Tue Nov  5 15:15:07 2002
> +++ linux-2.5.46/drivers/block/genhd.c  Tue Nov  5 16:14:35 2002
> @@ -326,7 +326,13 @@
>  }
>  static inline unsigned MSEC(unsigned x)
>  {
> -       return x * 1000 / HZ;
> +#if 1000 % HZ == 0
> +       return x * (1000 / HZ);
> +#elif HZ % 1000 == 0
> +       return x / (HZ / 1000);
> +#else
> +       return (x / HZ) * 1000 + (x % HZ) * 1000 / HZ;
> +#endif
>  }

My brain just fell out.   Why don't we just do

	return (x / HZ) * 1000;

?

Yes, it'll return zero for the first second of disk activity.
I don't think that matters?

	return ((x + HZ / 2) / HZ) * 1000;

would be more accurate too, and reduces it to half a second ;)



--- 25/drivers/block/genhd.c~msec-fix	Tue Nov  5 21:59:35 2002
+++ 25-akpm/drivers/block/genhd.c	Tue Nov  5 22:02:17 2002
@@ -324,10 +324,12 @@ static ssize_t disk_size_read(struct gen
 {
 	return off ? 0 : sprintf(page, "%llu\n",(unsigned long long)get_capacity(disk));
 }
-static inline unsigned MSEC(unsigned x)
+
+static unsigned jiffies_to_msec(unsigned jif)
 {
-	return x * 1000 / HZ;
+	return ((jif + HZ / 2) / HZ) * 1000;
 }
+
 static ssize_t disk_stat_read(struct gendisk * disk,
 			      char *page, size_t count, loff_t off)
 {
@@ -338,11 +340,11 @@ static ssize_t disk_stat_read(struct gen
 		"%8u %8u %8u"
 		"\n",
 		disk->reads, disk->read_merges, (u64)disk->read_sectors,
-		MSEC(disk->read_ticks),
+		jiffies_to_msec(disk->read_ticks),
 		disk->writes, disk->write_merges, (u64)disk->write_sectors,
-		MSEC(disk->write_ticks),
-		disk->in_flight, MSEC(disk->io_ticks),
-		MSEC(disk->time_in_queue));
+		jiffies_to_msec(disk->write_ticks),
+		disk->in_flight, jiffies_to_msec(disk->io_ticks),
+		jiffies_to_msec(disk->time_in_queue));
 }
 static struct disk_attribute disk_attr_dev = {
 	.attr = {.name = "dev", .mode = S_IRUGO },

_

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-06  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-06  5:09 [PATCH] 2.5.46: overflow in disk stats Lev Makhlis
2002-11-06  6:06 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-11-06  6:20   ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-06  7:19 ` Rick Lindsley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DC8B16E.EAFC854@digeo.com \
    --to=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlev@despammed.com \
    --cc=ricklind@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox