public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk" <m.kerrisk@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] 2.4.19 Fix adjtimex when txc->modes == 0
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 10:57:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DCB9884.19253.AE2807@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021108081529.559392C3AF@lists.samba.org>

Rusty,

your EMail address (Rusty Trivial Russell <@rustcorp.com.au>) 
is broken. I'm replying to linux-kernel instead.

I had reported this problem a long time (over a year at least) 
to the list. I found no 100% solution that is compatible with 
the old kernel version.

Best solution would be to separate the NTP functionality 
(ntp_adjtime, ntp_gettime) from adjtime() in the kernel.

I wonder how adjtime(NULL, non_null) is implemented:
If "modes == 0" adjtimex() will emulate ntp_gettime()
if "modes & ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT" is set with "txc->offset == 
0", the current correction will be stopped.
You must distinguish it from a call to adjtime(non_null, 
non_null) with an offset of 0 that will terminate the current 
correction.

(Manual says: "The second call to adjtime() stops the first 
call to adjtime() if delta is non-NULL, but does not undo the 
effects of the previous call. If delta is NULL, then no time 
correction will be done.")

If adjtimex() still should implement both library styles 
(ntp_*, and adjtime()), the clean solution would be a new flag 
like ADJ_OFFSET_QUERY (or ADJ_OFFSET_NO_SHOT or 
ADJ_OFFSET_PEACE).  [Well I'm beginning to like the last one ;-
)]

If adjtime(NULL, any) is used in Clib, adjtimex would have to 
be called with the ADJ_OFFSET_PEACE flag, avoiding to disturb 
the adjustment. If `any' is non-NULL, the offset would be 
returned to user land.

Rehards,
Ulrich

On 8 Nov 2002 at 18:51, Rusty Trivial Russell wrote:

> Ulrich, does this look good to you?
> 
> From:  "Michael Kerrisk" <m.kerrisk@gmx.net>
> 
>   Hello Marcelo (or Rusty does this belong you as TPM?),
>   
>   I did try submitting it against 2.4.18pre10 but this patch
>   didn't seem to make it.  The problem still exists in 2.4.19.
>   
>   The glibc implementation of adjtime(delta, old_delta) should return
>   the remaining time adjustment value from adjtimex() in old_delta if that
>   argument is non-NULL.  
>   
>   This is broken in the case that delta is NULL (i.e., we don't want 
>   a change, but just to find out the current time_adjust).  The breakage
>   occurs because adjtime specifies txc->modes as 0 (so that no change
>   is made to the current offset) and in this case do_adjtimex() does not
>   correctly return the required information in txc->offset.  
>   
>   The patch below (against 2.4.19) seems to me the best way to 
>   fix the problem.
>   
>   Cheers,
>   
>   Michael
>   
> 
> --- trivial-2.5-bk/kernel/time.c.orig	2002-11-08 18:46:34.000000000 +1100
> +++ trivial-2.5-bk/kernel/time.c	2002-11-08 18:46:34.000000000 +1100
> @@ -361,7 +361,9 @@
>  	    /* p. 24, (d) */
>  		result = TIME_ERROR;
>  	
> -	if ((txc->modes & ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT) == ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT)
> +	if (!txc->modes)
> +	    txc->offset	   = time_adjust;
> +	else if ((txc->modes & ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT) == ADJ_OFFSET_SINGLESHOT)
>  	    txc->offset	   = save_adjust;
>  	else {
>  	    if (time_offset < 0)
> -- 
>   Don't blame me: the Monkey is driving
>   File: "Michael Kerrisk" <m.kerrisk@gmx.net>: [patch] 2.4.19 Fix adjtimex when txc->modes == 0



       reply	other threads:[~2002-11-08  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20021108081529.559392C3AF@lists.samba.org>
2002-11-08  9:57 ` Ulrich Windl [this message]
2002-11-09  8:01   ` [TRIVIAL] 2.4.19 Fix adjtimex when txc->modes == 0 Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DCB9884.19253.AE2807@localhost \
    --to=ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.kerrisk@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox