From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:29:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:29:07 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:44255 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:29:06 -0500 Message-ID: <3DCFF883.AFE1B55C@digeo.com> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:35:47 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.46 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hugh Dickins CC: Dave McCracken , Rik van Riel , "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] flush_cache_page while pte valid References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2002 18:35:47.0888 (UTC) FILETIME=[27270300:01C289B1] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On some architectures (cachetlb.txt gives HyperSparc as an example) > it is essential to flush_cache_page while pte is still valid: the > rmap VM diverged from the base 2.4 VM before that fix was made, > so this error has crept back into 2.5. OK, thanks. > Patch below applies to 2.5.47 or 2.5.47-mm1 - needs more work over > shared pagetables, but they've silently fallen out of 2.5.47-mm1: > oversight? Yes, oversight. dcache-rcu was similarly lost. Pathetic, isn't it?