From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>,
Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:59:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DD16BA5.DFE01C34@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.3.96.1021112150713.25274B-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com
Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
> In the area of things I do do every day, the occasionally posted AIM and
> BYTE benchmarks look as though pipe latency and thruput are down, UNIX
> socket latency and thruput are down, and these are things which will make
> the system feel slower.
Yes, the AIM numbers which have been posted here are quite outrageous.
It's (hopefully) either a few Great Big Bugs or something in 2.5 has
invalidated the measurements. Or, conceivably, the reduction of the
size of the slabs_free list in the slab allocator.
I shall be taking a look at what's going on in there fairly soon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-12 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-11 23:31 [BENCHMARK] 2.5.47{-mm1} with contest Con Kolivas
2002-11-12 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-12 1:51 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-12 2:07 ` mark walters
2002-11-12 2:18 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-12 8:52 ` Giuliano Pochini
2002-11-12 9:20 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-12 9:40 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-12 3:04 ` Aaron Lehmann
2002-11-12 11:04 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-12 14:20 ` Aaron Lehmann
2002-11-12 14:23 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-12 20:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-11-12 20:59 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-11-20 23:02 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-21 0:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-21 1:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-21 6:54 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-21 13:20 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-21 17:21 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-21 17:26 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-21 18:18 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-21 18:25 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-11-21 14:00 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-21 19:59 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DD16BA5.DFE01C34@digeo.com \
--to=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=aaronl@vitelus.com \
--cc=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox