From: Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com>
To: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
Cc: Brian Jackson <brian-kernel-list@mdrx.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: md on shared storage
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:17:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DD28914.3050107@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021113114641.GI19811@marowsky-bree.de
Lars,
Another method is to lock an md array to a specific host. This method
requires no DLM (since there is no shared write to the same array
capability).
Thanks
-steve
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>On 2002-11-12T18:25:29,
> Brian Jackson <brian-kernel-list@mdrx.com> said:
>
>
>
>>Does the MD driver work with shared storage? I would also be interested to
>>know if the new DM driver works with shared storage(though I must admit I
>>didn't really try to answer this one myself, just hoping somebody will
>>know).
>>
>>
>
>The short answer is "Not sanely", as far as I know.
>
>RAID0 might be okay, however RAID1/5 get into issues if two nodes update the
>same data in parallel; they do not coordinate the writes, and thus might stomp
>over each other.
>
>In theory, given a RAID1 with disks {d1,d2}, node n1 might write in order
>(d2,d1) while n2 writes as (d1,d2), resulting in inconsistent mirrors. This
>becomes a bigger race window for RAID5, obviously, because more disks are
>involved.
>
>The "multiple nodes beginning to reconstruct the same md device" is also a
>problem; but even if that was solved that only one node does the recovery, the
>others would be blocked from doing any IO on that drive for the time being.
>
>Another issue that any node will want to update the md superblock regularly.
>
>LVM is fine, MD doesn't seem to be.
>
>With the MD patches I posted weeks ago, at least MD multipathing should work
>appropriately; even if the ugliness of multiple nodes scribbling over the
>superblock remains, it shouldn't matter because the autodetection is based
>only on the UUID for m-p.
>
>In short, you can do "MD", if you don't use it as "shared"; have only one node
>have a given md device active at any point in time. Thus, no autostart, but
>manual activation. This rules out "GFS over md", basically.
>
>If you want to fix that, it would be cool; it will just require a DLM,
>membership and communication services in the kernel. ;-)
>
>
>Sincerely,
> Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-13 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-13 0:25 md on shared storage Brian Jackson
2002-11-13 1:19 ` Steven Dake
2002-11-13 3:00 ` Michael Clark
2002-11-13 3:15 ` Brian Jackson
2002-11-13 13:22 ` Michael Clark
2002-11-13 2:51 ` Michael Clark
2002-11-13 11:46 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-11-13 17:17 ` Steven Dake [this message]
2002-11-13 17:25 ` Joel Becker
2002-11-13 17:56 ` Steven Dake
2002-11-13 17:24 ` Joel Becker
2002-11-13 15:35 ` Eric Weigle
2002-11-13 18:33 ` Brian Jackson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-13 19:25 Eric Weigle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DD28914.3050107@mvista.com \
--to=sdake@mvista.com \
--cc=brian-kernel-list@mdrx.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox