Re: Bugzilla bug tracking database for 2.5 now available.

Brad Hards
2002-11-15T03:49:45Z

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:43, Thomas Molina wrote:
> My question is how should compile failures figure into the bug database?
> Most of the compile failures are typos or thinkos that get quickly fixed.
> Should they get tracked, or dismissed quickly unless they linger on. I
> didn't track simple compile failures in my list.
It probably depends where in the 2.5 cycle you are up to.

While there are still a lot of changes going in, it isn't so critical.

When it gets to 2.5.99 and later, you need to track absolutely everything.
Even if that means entering the problem, and 20 minutes later entering the
patch that corrects it, and the next day closing the bug against Linus' next
release.

Given a resourced bug tracker, and the various test projects, this could be a
nice smooth release producing a product without gaping holes. But its
probably a bit soon to tell...

Brad

- --
http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. I'm registered. Are you?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE91G4kW6pHgIdAuOMRAkNiAKCNE7pvodft5ZC+e7nTqgbLeLO0ewCfQujm
bNoeJoLIea10YFPSTfyRdnM=
=SPCi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----