From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits ...
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:59:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DD946A2.7030501@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211181034290.979-100000@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> epoll does hook f_op->poll() and hence uses the asm/poll.h bits.
It does today. We are talking about "you promise that this will be the
case ever after or we'll cut your head off". I have no idea why you're
so reluctant since you don't have to maintain any of the user-level
bits. And it is not you who has to deal with the fallout of a change
when it happens.
If epoll is so different from poll (and this is what I've been told frmo
Davide) then there should be a clear separation of the interfaces and
all those arguing to unify the data types and constants better should
rethink there understanding.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE92Uai2ijCOnn/RHQRAnxbAJ9grqqA0HgAJTkHSpJMAxEBu6QFDwCeONNv
UI85HprHxc+v+dYmMPEVzR8=
=hZm1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-18 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-18 16:05 [rfc] epoll interface change and glibc bits Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 16:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-11-18 16:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 16:18 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-11-18 16:32 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 22:22 ` Matthew D. Hall
2002-11-18 17:51 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-18 18:37 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 19:59 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2002-11-18 21:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 22:56 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-18 23:56 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-19 1:34 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-19 1:50 ` Davide Libenzi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-18 18:40 Grant Taylor
2002-11-18 22:04 Grant Taylor
2002-11-18 22:32 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-18 23:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 22:21 Dan Kegel
2002-11-18 23:09 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 23:39 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-18 23:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 23:52 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-18 23:35 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-19 0:53 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-19 1:34 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-19 2:08 ` Dan Kegel
2002-11-19 2:04 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-19 3:46 ` Edgar Toernig
2002-11-19 4:14 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-19 5:35 ` Edgar Toernig
2002-11-19 6:09 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-19 17:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-20 1:59 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-20 3:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-20 3:46 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-20 4:04 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-20 8:01 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-20 23:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-20 23:51 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-20 23:57 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-21 0:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-21 1:23 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-21 1:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-21 0:33 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-21 0:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-21 1:04 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-21 20:08 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-11-21 16:51 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-21 17:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-20 22:04 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-20 22:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-20 23:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-20 23:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-20 7:47 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-19 3:53 ` Mark Mielke
[not found] <20021118223125.GB14649@mark.mielke.cc>
2002-11-19 0:23 ` Grant Taylor
2002-11-19 3:58 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-19 4:04 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-19 5:49 Grant Taylor
2002-11-19 6:22 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-19 15:24 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-11-19 17:28 Dan Kegel
2002-11-19 19:33 Grant Taylor
2002-11-19 19:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-19 20:57 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-19 20:54 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DD946A2.7030501@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox