The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nero <neroz@iinet.net.au>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] rmap15, rmap14c and rc1aa1 with contest
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:23:42 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DE0D2DE.1090006@iinet.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DE0D157.9020906@iinet.net.au>

Nero wrote:

> noload:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       84.6    95      0       0       1.00
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      84.2    96      0       0       1.00
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [2]       41.0    49      0       0       inf

The time for rc1aa1 here is obviously wrong - this is a bug in contest, 
according to Dr. Kolivas :-)

>
> process_load:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       140.8   55      133     45      1.66
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      139.4   56      126     45      1.65
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [2]       133.9   14      211     84      inf
>
> io_load:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       164.8   51      33      19      1.95
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      160.1   53      33      21      1.90
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       166.2   49      44      23      inf
>
> read_load:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       0.0     0       0       7       0.00
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      121.0   72      20      7       1.44
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       111.2   79      34      14      inf
>
> rmap15 OOM'd the cc1 process twice and fscked this run up.
>
> list_load:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       99.2    84      0       7       1.17
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      100.7   83      0       7       1.20
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       96.7    85      0       8       inf
>
> mem_load:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       111.2   80      96      8       1.31
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      106.1   82      96      9       1.26
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       126.3   66      77      3       inf
>



  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-24 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-24 13:17 [BENCHMARK] rmap15, rmap14c and rc1aa1 with contest Nero
2002-11-24 13:23 ` Nero [this message]
2002-11-24 13:32 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-24 13:34 ` Nero
2002-11-24 17:39 ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DE0D2DE.1090006@iinet.net.au \
    --to=neroz@iinet.net.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox